FWIW, I removed LAST from Cyrus 2.2. I read through all of the
ietf-pop3 archives and it seems as if this command was ill-defined and
doomed from the start. It was removed from the POP3 spec two RFC's ago
and replaced by UIDL as the correct way for clients to track which
messages it has alrea
David Carter wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Ken Murchison wrote:
RFC 1460 says nothing about maintaining this info across sessions. It
also doesn't prohibit it. The Cyrus behavior seems perfectly reasonable
and correct according to the ancient spec which defines it.
Yep. I wasn't suggesting th
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Ken Murchison wrote:
> RFC 1460 says nothing about maintaining this info across sessions. It
> also doesn't prohibit it. The Cyrus behavior seems perfectly reasonable
> and correct according to the ancient spec which defines it.
Yep. I wasn't suggesting the behaviour is unr
David Carter wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm in the process of migrating from the UW IMAP and POP servers to Cyrus.
One of my fetchmail users has picked up an inconsistency in the way that
the two POP servers handle the POP3 LAST command. The LAST command appears
to be obsolete, but is still fetchmail'
