Roland Pope wrote:
>
> This means that the CYRUS server box doesn't
> incure the overhead of having to negotiate 2 TCP conenctions for every 1 client,
> as well as the SSL negotiation overhead.
Do you think I could resolve this satisfactorily by simply
adding a couple more processors to the box?
Roland Pope wrote:
>
>
>>would split your users to multiple servers to start with. Or use
>>front ends which is the TLS endpoint, and proxies the session to the
>>right server, then the mail server doesn't need to do TLS as well.
>>
>>
> I agree. We use stunnel on seperate machines to provid
> Gary Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'd be interested in hearing about others' experiences on
> > the impact of stunnel or SASL on server resources. Any
> > thoughts on the relative merits of either architecture
> > of providing SSL sessions would also be appreciated. We'll
> > need t
Gary Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd be interested in hearing about others' experiences on
> the impact of stunnel or SASL on server resources. Any
> thoughts on the relative merits of either architecture
> of providing SSL sessions would also be appreciated. We'll
> need to protect both
