> Tarjei Huse wrote:
>
>>tir, 02,.11.2004 kl. 11.39 -0500, skrev Warrick FitzGerald:
>>
>>
>>>Earl R Shannon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Hello,
Comments are imbedded below.
Warrick FitzGerald wrote:
>Posted this last night, but did not see it come through ... sorry
>
Tarjei Huse wrote:
tir, 02,.11.2004 kl. 11.39 -0500, skrev Warrick FitzGerald:
Earl R Shannon wrote:
Hello,
Comments are imbedded below.
Warrick FitzGerald wrote:
Posted this last night, but did not see it come through ... sorry
about the re-post if you have this already.
=
tir, 02,.11.2004 kl. 11.39 -0500, skrev Warrick FitzGerald:
> Earl R Shannon wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Comments are imbedded below.
> >
> > Warrick FitzGerald wrote:
> >
> >> Posted this last night, but did not see it come through ... sorry
> >> about the re-post if you have this already.
> >>
Warrick FitzGerald said:
> That's what I was afraid of. Sounds to me like the people who aren't
> going to "get" this concept should keep using POP3 :)
>
> 1. Does anyone have "best practices" that I can share with users on how
> they should move mail off the server when their quota is exceeded?
>
Earl R Shannon wrote:
Hello,
Comments are imbedded below.
Warrick FitzGerald wrote:
Posted this last night, but did not see it come through ... sorry
about the re-post if you have this already.
I’m in the process of moving an office of POP3 users to IMAP, and
realized that that I do
Hello,
Comments are imbedded below.
Warrick FitzGerald wrote:
Posted this last night, but did not see it come through ... sorry about
the re-post if you have this already.
I’m in the process of moving an office of POP3 users to IMAP, and
realized that that I don’t fully understand h
