On 5/26/2010 8:06 AM, Blake Hudson wrote:
> I wish it were that straightforward. After performing several
> switchovers where DNS A records were repointed, many clients (days
> later) continue trying to access the old servers. TTL on the DNS records
> are set appropriately short, this is simply a c
Andy Bennett wrote:
> In failure cases existing clients will wobble for a bit until their
> cache expires and then the connections will have to be reestablished.
>
I wish it were that straightforward. After performing several
switchovers where DNS A records were repointed, many clients (days
On 5/11/2010 5:35 AM, Andre Nathan wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm setting up a two-machine cyrus cluster using OCFS2 over DRBD. The
> setup is working fine, and I'm now considering the load balancing
> options I have.
>
> I believe the simplest option would be to simply rely on DNS load
> balancing. Howeve
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 09:12 -0700, Vincent Fox wrote:
> We symlink our proc and log directories out to
> TMPFS directories local to each server. There is
> little sense to keeping proc & logs on disk IMO.
Do you know if the log directory is used even when none of the databases
is set to berkele
On 5/11/2010 6:40 AM, Andre Nathan wrote:
> What I still haven't figured out is how to keep the proc directory and
> the locks in the socket directory local to the cluster nodes. For the
> socket names there are configuration options, so I could just choose
> different names for each cluster node.
Hi,
> I'm setting up a two-machine cyrus cluster using OCFS2 over DRBD. The
> setup is working fine, and I'm now considering the load balancing
> options I have.
>
> I believe the simplest option would be to simply rely on DNS load
> balancing. However, for this to work, I need to consider what h
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 09:16 -0400, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
> By the way, did you test your setup with considerable load?, I was
> really interested in this kind of solution, looking at various docs
> and mail posts, main concern seems to be file locking
I've tested DRBD and OCFS2 under heavy load,
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 08:57 -0400, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
> LVS is quite simple to setup this days, there's no need to patch the
> kernel with any mainstream distribution...
Yeah, that was my second option, as I already use it for other services.
I was just wondering if I could come up with something
2010/5/11 Kenneth Marshall :
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:35:26AM -0300, Andre Nathan wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I'm setting up a two-machine cyrus cluster using OCFS2 over DRBD. The
>> setup is working fine, and I'm now considering the load balancing
>> options I have.
>>
By the way, did you test your
2010/5/11 Andre Nathan :
> Hello
>
> I'm setting up a two-machine cyrus cluster using OCFS2 over DRBD. The
> setup is working fine, and I'm now considering the load balancing
> options I have.
>
> I believe the simplest option would be to simply rely on DNS load
> balancing. However, for this to wo
Quoting Andre Nathan :
Hello
I'm setting up a two-machine cyrus cluster using OCFS2 over DRBD. The
setup is working fine, and I'm now considering the load balancing
options I have.
For Clustering Cyrus have a look at
http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki/bin/view/Cyrus/CyrusCluster
I have no e
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:35:26AM -0300, Andre Nathan wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm setting up a two-machine cyrus cluster using OCFS2 over DRBD. The
> setup is working fine, and I'm now considering the load balancing
> options I have.
>
> I believe the simplest option would be to simply rely on DNS lo
12 matches
Mail list logo
