On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 10:36 +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 09:47, Timo Veith wrote:
> > Which way would you recommend for copying: rsync, tar, cp or whatever? I
> > am concerned about the databases that cyrus uses. Will they they be
> > consistent afterwards. Is there an
>> Is that an allusion to the "experimental" status of dm-snapshots in the
>> linux kernel or just a general statement? :)
>
> It was a slight linux dig (me being a FreeBSD person), but in general if you
> really care about your emails then working snapshots are a good thing :)
As a user of lvm sn
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 19:06, Timo Veith wrote:
> Am Dienstag 31 Januar 2006 01:06 schrieben Sie:
> > The critical thing would be that you did a snapshot though.. (and your
> > snapshot implementation works :)
>
> Is that an allusion to the "experimental" status of dm-snapshots in the
> linux k
Am Dienstag 31 Januar 2006 01:06 schrieben Sie:
> The critical thing would be that you did a snapshot though.. (and your
> snapshot implementation works :)
Is that an allusion to the "experimental" status of dm-snapshots in the
linux kernel or just a general statement? :)
Timo
Cyrus Home Pa
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 09:47, Timo Veith wrote:
> Which way would you recommend for copying: rsync, tar, cp or whatever? I
> am concerned about the databases that cyrus uses. Will they they be
> consistent afterwards. Is there anything I have to be aware of or do
> before? I don't want to break
