Re: ACLs and cross-namespace move problem

2013-03-12 Thread Thomas Cataldo
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Marc Patermann < hans.mo...@ofd-z.niedersachsen.de> wrote: > Thomas, > > Thomas Cataldo schrieb (11.03.2013 10:21 Uhr): > > >> "Note that some rights are available implicitly, for example 'anonymous' >> always has 'p' on user INBOXes, and users always have rights o

Re: ACLs and cross-namespace move problem

2013-03-11 Thread Marc Patermann
Thomas, Thomas Cataldo schrieb (11.03.2013 10:21 Uhr): > I have a problem with shared user mailboxes and permissions on cyrus 2.4.16. > > User A has read/write access on user B ("lrswipkxte") > > Folders looks like this for user A: > >INBOX >Archive > 2012 >Other Users/ <== t

Re: ACLs

2005-10-24 Thread Ken Murchison
Joseph Brennan wrote: Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I know I had to give "anyone" "p" on shared folders. I tried giving "p" to user "cyrus", but it somehow did not work, not sure why. Delivery is done from Sendmail via LMTP and I did setup auth-info, so Sendmail should have authenti

Re: ACLs

2005-10-24 Thread Joseph Brennan
Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I know I had to give "anyone" "p" on shared folders. I tried giving "p" to user "cyrus", but it somehow did not work, not sure why. Delivery is done from Sendmail via LMTP and I did setup auth-info, so Sendmail should have authenticated itself as user "c

Re: ACLs

2005-10-24 Thread Ken Murchison
Nikola Milutinovic wrote: Ken Murchison wrote: Jt Chiodi wrote: I have noticed that a sub folder of a user's INBOX does not have anyone p set on it when it is created. I am not giving my users access to cyradm and do not want to change acls everytime a mailbox is created. I would like to s

Re: ACLs

2005-10-24 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
Ken Murchison wrote: Jt Chiodi wrote: I have noticed that a sub folder of a user's INBOX does not have anyone p set on it when it is created. I am not giving my users access to cyradm and do not want to change acls everytime a mailbox is created. I would like to set the default sub folder be

Re: ACLs

2005-10-24 Thread Ken Murchison
Jt Chiodi wrote: I have noticed that a sub folder of a user's INBOX does not have anyone p set on it when it is created. I am not giving my users access to cyradm and do not want to change acls everytime a mailbox is created. I would like to set the default sub folder behavior to anyone p. I

Re: acls on shared folders

2005-03-26 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, seph wrote: wouldn't it let cyrus deliver to shared boxes without having to give anyone p? Am I missing something obvious? Yes, but what is that saving you from? users shooting themselves in the foot. In my experience, users viewing shared folders through an MTA quite often do

Re: acls on shared folders

2005-03-26 Thread seph
>> wouldn't it let cyrus deliver to shared boxes without having to give >> anyone p? Am I missing something obvious? > > Yes, but what is that saving you from? users shooting themselves in the foot. In my experience, users viewing shared folders through an MTA quite often do things they oughtn't:

Re: acls on shared folders

2005-03-25 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, seph wrote: Well, it hardcodes "postman" in yet another place but that's about the only complaint. But what does doing this buy you? wouldn't it let cyrus deliver to shared boxes without having to give anyone p? Am I missing something obvious? Yes, but what is that saving you f

Re: acls on shared folders

2005-03-25 Thread seph
>> This seems to have come up countless times before, and I haven't ever >> seen a conclusive answer. My lmtpd logs that it's pre-auth'ed, but I >> can't figure out how to grant it rights. I found this patch >> http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.cyrus-devel&msg=745 > > Well,

Re: acls on shared folders

2005-03-25 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, seph wrote: I'd like to use a couple shared imap folders to archive some of our internal lists. I can't figure out how to make the acl do what I want. Is there any way to avoid giving anyone the post right? This seems to have come up countless times before, and I haven't ever s

Re: ACLs, public folders, group:, saslauthd, LDAP, etc.

2004-02-20 Thread Simon Matter
> Quoting Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > Anyways, I've got the group added to LDAP, and 'id user' is showing >> that >> > getgrent(3) sees the 'straycats' group. However, setting the >> > 'group:straycats' >> >> How is your saslauthd configured? > > I'm using Fedora Raw Hide, so in /etc/

Re: ACLs, public folders, group:, saslauthd, LDAP, etc.

2004-02-20 Thread Derek P. Moore
Quoting Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Anyways, I've got the group added to LDAP, and 'id user' is showing that > > getgrent(3) sees the 'straycats' group. However, setting the > > 'group:straycats' > > How is your saslauthd configured? I'm using Fedora Raw Hide, so in /etc/sysconfig/sas

Re: ACLs, public folders, group:, saslauthd, LDAP, etc.

2004-02-20 Thread Simon Matter
> Howdy, again, > > Another problem, another email. This problem I've yet to solve. > > I've got series of mailboxes (straycat.*) and I want to use the group: > mechanism > to set the ACLs for these mailboxes, as this seems the most elegant > solution. > I thought to myself, "I'll just add all the

Re: ACLs and such

2003-02-07 Thread Luca Olivetti
Hans Wilmer escribió:: BTW, which IMAP clients or other programs are out there that allow users to easily edit their ACLs? A webclient to just set ACLs would also be ok. It would be *very* nice if I could tell our users to set the permissions they want on their mailfolders all on their own :) w

Re: ACLs and such

2003-02-07 Thread Chris Hastie
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Hans Wilmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote BTW, which IMAP clients or other programs are out there that allow users to easily edit their ACLs? A webclient to just set ACLs would also be ok. It would be *very* nice if I could tell our users to set the permissions they want on their m

Re: ACLs and such

2003-02-06 Thread Hans Wilmer
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 07:47:45PM -0500, Rob Siemborski wrote: > So, Offhand, I think the rest of your mail is to special purpose for > general use, but I'll address this part of it, since its been brought up > before. At least the ability to automatically spread folders across several partition

Re: ACLs and such

2003-02-06 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Hans Wilmer wrote: > BTW, which IMAP clients or other programs are out there that allow > users to easily edit their ACLs? A webclient to just set ACLs would > also be ok. It would be *very* nice if I could tell our users to set > the permissions they want on their mailfolders

Re: ACLs and such

2003-02-05 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Ken Murchison wrote: > > Its in the 2.2 branch. Its probably possible to backport it, but IIRC > we discussed this and decided that 2.1 was in feature freeze. > Yeah, that makes sense. Need to go get my memory checked ;) -Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: ACLs and such

2003-02-05 Thread Ken Murchison
Rob Siemborski wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Hans Wilmer wrote: > > > cm user.test > > cm user.test.archives otherpartition > > > > sq user.test 100 > > sq user.test.archives 1000 > > > > sam user.test.archives test lrswipca > > > > > > ... and nevertheless allow user 'test' to delete mails an

Re: ACLs and such

2003-02-05 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Hans Wilmer wrote: > cm user.test > cm user.test.archives otherpartition > > sq user.test 100 > sq user.test.archives 1000 > > sam user.test.archives test lrswipca > > > ... and nevertheless allow user 'test' to delete mails and folders > residing under user.test.archives by de