Re: ACL problem

2010-12-09 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 03:27:59PM +0100, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > Hi, > > no takers? I get that the developers are probably only concerned > with 2.4.x, so perhaps one of you could try to verify if the > behavior there is the same? Just try to set the ACL for a mailbox > that belongs to user u

Re: ACL problem

2010-12-09 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
Hi, no takers? I get that the developers are probably only concerned with 2.4.x, so perhaps one of you could try to verify if the behavior there is the same? Just try to set the ACL for a mailbox that belongs to user using the same account. If you try to set it to "weraslpki", does it take or

Re: ACL Problem

2004-12-08 Thread Ken Murchison
Timo Eissler wrote: Hello List, i just want to ask why the flags for deleting a mailbox are not splitted from the flag to create a sub-mailbox. Its because the original ACL extension (RFC 2086) was vague on which right controlled DELETE. Some implementations like Cyrus tie it to the 'c' (CREATE