Re: 2.4.10 and problem with quota

2011-07-12 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote: > That's expected, because it's a "prefix", not a "user". > > But - you have a good point. If we make it user rather than > prefix, then it avoids a bunch of problems. I'm sold. Will > be an interface change, but meh. IMO, if we want prefix, we should

Re: 2.4.10 and problem with quota

2011-07-12 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:28:21PM +0300, Eero Hänninen wrote: > Thanks Bron! Seems working now. > Only side effect is that, now it will fix quotas for user.name* not > only for user.name :) > > cyrus@mh14$ /usr/lib64/cyrus/bin/quota -f user.guns > user.guns: quota root (none) --> user.guns > user

Re: 2.4.10 and problem with quota

2011-07-12 Thread Eero Hänninen
Hi.. On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:14:01 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 03:38:27PM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: >> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:29:56 +0200, Eero Hänninen >> wrote: >> >> > Hi.. >> > >> > On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:24:00 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: >> >> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011

Re: 2.4.10 and problem with quota

2011-07-11 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 03:38:27PM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:29:56 +0200, Eero Hänninen wrote: > > > Hi.. > > > > On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:24:00 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: > >> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:59:09 +0200, Eero Hänninen > >> wrote: > >>> Is it bug or just corrupt

Re: 2.4.10 and problem with quota

2011-07-08 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:29:56 +0200, Eero Hänninen wrote: > Hi.. > > On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:24:00 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: >> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:59:09 +0200, Eero Hänninen >> wrote: >>> Is it bug or just corrupted data or some kind misconfiguration, or >>> is >>> it better use skiplist as

Re: 2.4.10 and problem with quota

2011-07-08 Thread Eero Hänninen
Hi.. On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:24:00 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:59:09 +0200, Eero Hänninen > wrote: >> Is it bug or just corrupted data or some kind misconfiguration, or >> is >> it better use skiplist as quota data holder ? > I will write a unit test that looks for thi

Re: 2.4.10 and problem with quota

2011-07-08 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:59:09 +0200, Eero Hänninen wrote: > Hi.. > > Just routine mailbox checks after upgrade to cyrus-imap 2.4.10 I > discovered, that some mailboxes doesn't have quotaroot, and its not > possible to set. > I run manually quota -f and re-set quota, but nothing is changed. I > not