> --On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:10 PM +0200 Daniel Eckl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=1212
>> https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2690
>
> Thanks!
>
> --On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 8:36 PM +0200 Simon Matter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:10 PM +0200 Daniel Eckl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=1212
https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2690
Thanks!
--On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 8:36 PM +0200 Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
With
> --On Saturday, August 05, 2006 6:55 PM +0200 Simon Matter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I would like to hear specifically from Ken on this one...
>
> I asked the question myself and go an answer suggesting the limit is not
> 2GB,
> but 2TB. I saw a posting from Ken earlier on suggesting s
Scott, just for some simulated testing I installed Cyrus 2.3 on a test
box and loaded up a mailbox to over 10GB (hundreds of thousands of tiny
messages). The mailbox was still responsive, however the squat process
would take a long time to run and would lock the mailbox for long
periods while i
Hi Scott!
You don't need Ken here. You need google. :)
https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=1212
https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2690
Best,
Daniel
Scott Adkins schrieb:
--On Saturday, August 05, 2006 6:55 PM +0200 Simon Matter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, I wou
--On Saturday, August 05, 2006 6:55 PM +0200 Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Okay, I would like to hear specifically from Ken on this one...
I asked the question myself and go an answer suggesting the limit is not 2GB,
but 2TB. I saw a posting from Ken earlier on suggesting something si
> On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:34 +0200, Daniel Eckl wrote:
>> Perhaps I didn't describe the max quota limit problem good enough:
>>
>> When your system is affected by this problem and you set a quota greater
>> than 2 GB, it results in running mad. In this case it will report over
>> quota way before
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:34 +0200, Daniel Eckl wrote:
> Perhaps I didn't describe the max quota limit problem good enough:
>
> When your system is affected by this problem and you set a quota greater
> than 2 GB, it results in running mad. In this case it will report over
> quota way before 2GB.
