Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-05-10 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Marc Patermann wrote: > Hi, > > Jeroen van Meeuwen schrieb (19.04.2012 12:00 Uhr): > > > I'm forwarding this message posted to the announcement mailing list > > originally, to let you know any upgrades should target 2.4.16 as opposed to > > 2.4.15. > >

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-05-10 Thread Marc Patermann
Dave, Dave McMurtrie schrieb (10.05.2012 17:53 Uhr): > On 05/10/2012 11:45 AM, Marc Patermann wrote: >> Jeroen van Meeuwen schrieb (19.04.2012 12:00 Uhr): Thanks for fixing the wiki. >> There is not "CHANGES" page in the wiki, is there? > > Do you mean for changes to the wiki site, or for chang

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-05-10 Thread Dave McMurtrie
On 05/10/2012 11:45 AM, Marc Patermann wrote: > Hi, > > Jeroen van Meeuwen schrieb (19.04.2012 12:00 Uhr): > >> I'm forwarding this message posted to the announcement mailing list >> originally, to let you know any upgrades should target 2.4.16 as opposed to >> 2.4.15. >> >> We are pleased to annou

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-05-10 Thread Marc Patermann
Hi, Jeroen van Meeuwen schrieb (19.04.2012 12:00 Uhr): > I'm forwarding this message posted to the announcement mailing list > originally, to let you know any upgrades should target 2.4.16 as opposed to > 2.4.15. > > We are pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.4.16. > > This is a

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-04-26 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 04:12:38PM +0200, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > Bron, > > sorry, somehow I forgot about this mail! > > --On 19. April 2012 20:04:04 +0200 Bron Gondwana wrote: > > >>I think I've read all the available information regarding the issue, > >>but I'm still confused. We're still

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-04-26 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
Bron, sorry, somehow I forgot about this mail! --On 19. April 2012 20:04:04 +0200 Bron Gondwana wrote: I think I've read all the available information regarding the issue, but I'm still confused. We're still running 2.3.x for production, but I have a test system with a copy of the production

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-04-25 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 07:45:27PM +0200, Simon Matter wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 11:00 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > >> Hi there, > >> > >> I'm forwarding this message posted to the announcement mailing list > >> originally, to let you know any upgrades should target 2.4.16 as opposed >

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-04-25 Thread Simon Matter
> On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 11:00 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I'm forwarding this message posted to the announcement mailing list >> originally, to let you know any upgrades should target 2.4.16 as opposed >> to >> 2.4.15. >> >> We are pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IM

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-04-25 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 11:00 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm forwarding this message posted to the announcement mailing list > originally, to let you know any upgrades should target 2.4.16 as opposed to > 2.4.15. > > We are pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.4

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-04-19 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 06:03:20PM +0200, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > --On 19. April 2012 11:00:01 +0100 Jeroen van Meeuwen > wrote: > > >It contains exactly one bugfix in tools/rehash, which was rewritten after > >2.4.14 introduced a critical fault for deployments that have the > >fulldirhash o

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-04-19 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
--On 19. April 2012 11:00:01 +0100 Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: It contains exactly one bugfix in tools/rehash, which was rewritten after 2.4.14 introduced a critical fault for deployments that have the fulldirhash option enabled. Release 2.4.15 was released to resolve this issue, among others,

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-04-19 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:49:15PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:19:32 +0900, Dennis Davis wrote: > > +#include > > or use BIT32_MAX (defined in lib/util.h) instead of UNIT32_MAX? I'm planning to get rid of all the BIT32 nonsense. Bron. Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyru

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-04-19 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 01:19:32PM +0100, Dennis Davis wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > > > From: Jeroen van Meeuwen > > To: cyrus-de...@lists.andrew.cmu.edu, info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu > > Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:00:01 > > Subject: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 r

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-04-19 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:19:32 +0100 (BST) > Dennis Davis said: D.H.Davis> Got the following error when compiling this on OpenBSD5.0: D.H.Davis> util.c: In function 'dir_hash_c': D.H.Davis> util.c:284: error: 'UINT32_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function) D.H.Davis> util.c:28

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-04-19 Thread OBATA Akio
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:19:32 +0900, Dennis Davis wrote: > Got the following error when compiling this on OpenBSD5.0: > > util.c: In function 'dir_hash_c': > util.c:284: error: 'UINT32_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function) > util.c:284: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only on

Re: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released

2012-04-19 Thread Dennis Davis
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > From: Jeroen van Meeuwen > To: cyrus-de...@lists.andrew.cmu.edu, info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu > Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:00:01 > Subject: (important) cyrus-imapd 2.4.16 released ... > We are pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.4.