On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:25:38PM +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 12:46 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > We (FastMail) always run old
> > logs first.
>
> Bron, but this blocks starting up the master till the replica has
> catched up? Sometimes the sync is broken, or do you detect it?
W
On 03/13/2012 12:46 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> We (FastMail) always run old
> logs first.
Bron, but this blocks starting up the master till the replica has
catched up? Sometimes the sync is broken, or do you detect it?
Thanks
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info:
der? first "log-PID" and then "log"?
Thanks for the response!
Manel Gimeno Zaragoza
magiz...@hotmail.com
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:56:48 +0100
From: michael.me...@zdv.uni-tuebingen.de
To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Sync log replica process
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:56:48AM +0100, Michael Menge wrote:
> >So, my question is, is it necessary to process the "log-PID"
> >before sync the "log" file? Because in my test it looks like it's
> >not necessary.
> It depends on what actions where done while the syncornisation was down
> Cyrus do
Hi,
Quoting Manel Gimeno Zaragozá :
Hello,
I've some doubts about how sync logs and the order about how they
should be processed. I've done some bunch tests and during the
process stop replic to try to simulate a possible crash.
In my test I've saw the following:
1.- I send 10 mails to
