RE: New server

2001-10-22 Thread Larry Greenfield
--On Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:25 PM -0400 Kiarna Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow. > Yes you are right if that is a base performance. > I have 2.0.16 currently for cyrus. Sendmail 8.22. > > Is there specific tuning I need to do? > Are there FAQ's available? > > My mail queue is high a

RE: New server

2001-10-04 Thread jh_lists
> I hadn't heard that postfix was more efficiant than sendmail. I shall have to look >into it. > Was the migration form sendmail to postfix difficult? > I greatly appreciate your input! > The migration couldn't be easier. Postfix comes with detailed, simple, step-by-step instructions for migrati

RE: New server

2001-10-04 Thread Kiarna Boyd
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:18 PM To: Info-Cyrus (E-mail) Subject: RE: New server At 02:25 PM 10/3/2001 -0400, Kiarna Boyd wrote: >Wow. >Yes you are right if that is a base performance. >I have 2.0.16 currently for cyrus. Sendmail 8.22. > &

RE: New server

2001-10-03 Thread Nick Simicich
At 02:25 PM 10/3/2001 -0400, Kiarna Boyd wrote: >Wow. >Yes you are right if that is a base performance. >I have 2.0.16 currently for cyrus. Sendmail 8.22. > >Is there specific tuning I need to do? >Are there FAQ's available? I was running sendmail on a P-100 which primarily served as a mailing l

RE: New server

2001-10-03 Thread Kiarna Boyd
al to the server though. I show 7 sendmail processes each at around 6 %. Thanks for your help! -Kiarna -Original Message- From: Lawrence Greenfield [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:04 PM To: Info-Cyrus (E-mail); [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

Re: New server

2001-10-03 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
It's much more important that you understand what is causing such a high load on your system right now. We support over 5000 concurrent connections on two 450 MHz UltraSpace-II processors and 2 gigs of memory, and run at peak times at around a 3 load average. It's also important to think about I