On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 10:22, Jeremy Fisher wrote:
>
> It's a good thought, and I've tried that from the
> shell. Took a few seconds to figure out that there was
> no hostname available for the IP address -- not ten
> minutes! So I'm not sure if Sendmail and Cyrus are
> calling a separate process th
Hi Jeremy,
--On Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:22 AM -0700 Jeremy Fisher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| It's a good thought, and I've tried that from the
| shell. Took a few seconds to figure out that there was
| no hostname available for the IP address -- not ten
| minutes! So I'm not sure if Sendmail
--- Jim Levie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 10-15 minutes sounds way too long for a DNS problem,
> unless the DNS for
> the client's IP is exceptionally slow to respond.
> I'd expect a DNS time
> out to be on the order of 1-2 minutes.
>
> You can check to see if a reverse lookup is really
> taking
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 14:41, Jeremy Fisher wrote:
>
> So, for example, the outside client is attempting to
> connect to the IMAP, POP, or SMTP services and my
> server is then (apparently) attempting to resolve a
> hostname based on the IP address of the client. There
> is no hostname available, bu
> > I have a client who is connecting to IMAP and/or
> POP
> > services and is waiting 10-15 minutes to
> successfully
> > check his mail. I think it may have something to
> do
> > with the fact that his ISP is not providing him
> with a
> > hostname, and for some reason IMAP (or my FreeBSD
> box
>
> I have a client who is connecting to IMAP and/or POP
> services and is waiting 10-15 minutes to successfully
> check his mail. I think it may have something to do
> with the fact that his ISP is not providing him with a
> hostname, and for some reason IMAP (or my FreeBSD box
> in general?) is at
