Le 06/01/2012 17:50, Bron Gondwana a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:04:26AM +0100, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
>>> With meta-partition on a fast SSD device this even would not have
>>> occured (500 GB SSD needed in our case)
>>
>> We don't have any of those, unfortunately ...
>
> As nice as
On 01/06/2012 01:05 PM, Eric Luyten wrote:
On Fri, January 6, 2012 5:50 pm, Bron Gondwana wrote:
I'm not convinced it was the best idea (after the
troubles people have had with it)...
Hey, don't worry too much. We'll survive :-)
Agreed. Two hours of high load on a Sunday morning was wor
On Fri, January 6, 2012 5:50 pm, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> I'm not convinced it was the best idea (after the
> troubles people have had with it)...
Hey, don't worry too much. We'll survive :-)
Eric (taking the opportunity to thank you for your continuing
efforts in developing and supporti
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:04:26AM +0100, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
> >With meta-partition on a fast SSD device this even would not have
> >occured (500 GB SSD needed in our case)
>
> We don't have any of those, unfortunately ...
As nice as SSDs are, they wouldn't have helped - the IO hit is
On Fri, January 6, 2012 3:05 pm, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
>
> --On 6. Januar 2012 15:00:44 +0100 Eric Luyten
> wrote:
>
>
>> To give you an idea : 73k users, 508k mailboxes, 4.5 TB of messages, 48M
>> messages. In an additional effort to grasp the dynamics of our central mail
>> syst
Hi Eric,
--On 6. Januar 2012 15:00:44 +0100 Eric Luyten
wrote:
To give you an idea : 73k users, 508k mailboxes, 4.5 TB of messages, 48M
messages.
In an additional effort to grasp the dynamics of our central mail system
(when hosting over 10k users it pays to have regular reporting and
statis
On Fri, January 6, 2012 11:04 am, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
> Hi Pascal,
>
>
> thanks for your reply! I decided to ask my more specific questions in separate
> mails, but I have a few follow-up questions for you.
>
> --On 5. Januar 2012 19:50:28 +0100 Pascal Gienger
> wrote:
>
>
>> In principle it
Hi Pascal,
thanks for your reply! I decided to ask my more specific questions in
separate mails, but I have a few follow-up questions for you.
--On 5. Januar 2012 19:50:28 +0100 Pascal Gienger
wrote:
In principle it is simple, but I hit a hard ground today. I did the
mistake to miscalcula
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:10:57PM +0100, Pascal Gienger wrote:
> Le 05/01/2012 21:06, Bron Gondwana a écrit :
> >On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 07:50:28PM +0100, Pascal Gienger wrote:
> >>flushseenstate: 1
> >
> >Doesn't do anything any more, I'm pretty sure.
> >
> >In fact - just checked. It's still in
Le 05/01/2012 21:06, Bron Gondwana a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 07:50:28PM +0100, Pascal Gienger wrote:
>> flushseenstate: 1
>
> Doesn't do anything any more, I'm pretty sure.
>
> In fact - just checked. It's still in the imapd.conf docs,
> but it doesn't do anything. I'm going to delete t
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 07:50:28PM +0100, Pascal Gienger wrote:
> flushseenstate: 1
Doesn't do anything any more, I'm pretty sure.
In fact - just checked. It's still in the imapd.conf docs,
but it doesn't do anything. I'm going to delete that now.
Bron ( seen state is now in the cyrus.index fo
Le 05/01/2012 17:00, Sebastian Hagedorn a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> we're currently running a rather outdated configuration, with Cyrus
> 2.3.14 and RHEL 3 i386 on hardware that's almost 7 years old. I'm
> planning an upgrade to 2.4 with RHEL 5 x86_64 and I have a umber of
> questions regarding new feature
Hi,
we're currently running a rather outdated configuration, with Cyrus 2.3.14
and RHEL 3 i386 on hardware that's almost 7 years old. I'm planning an
upgrade to 2.4 with RHEL 5 x86_64 and I have a umber of questions regarding
new features that I played around with using 2.4.13. I've searched t
13 matches
Mail list logo
