Re: Possible sendmail misconfiguration to deliver to cyrus

2006-12-04 Thread Jo Rhett
On Dec 4, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Todd Lyons wrote: On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 09:23:47PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote: Can you create a list of all of your users from some other information? If so, 1. Put a list of all of your domains in /etc/mail/virtual-domains 2. put each and every user in virtusertable

SOLVED! Re: Possible sendmail misconfiguration to deliver to cyrus

2006-12-04 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 07:58:02PM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote: >I'm looking at a cyrus limitation right now. I'm really thinking this >is not cyrus' problem. I'm trying to figure out if it's actually a >sendmail limitation or a sendmail config error on

Re: Possible sendmail misconfiguration to deliver to cyrus

2006-12-04 Thread Mirosław Jaworski
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 10:24 -0800, Todd Lyons wrote: > >This solved my problem but it requires that I have a local machine account > >for > >each cyrus user. As a small domain that's not a problem for me, but others > >might find it too restrictive. > > I'll test it. As long as by "local user

Re: Possible sendmail misconfiguration to deliver to cyrus

2006-12-04 Thread Todd Lyons
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:22:10AM -0600, Dave McCracken wrote: >> As I see it, a more sendmailish solution would be to use a little >> sendmail-fu and make it so that sendmail checks for local user at smtp >> time, but delivers to cyrus at deliver time. I don't have such fu, but >> I see now as

Re: Possible sendmail misconfiguration to deliver to cyrus

2006-12-04 Thread Dave McCracken
On Monday 04 December 2006 10:31 am, Todd Lyons wrote: > As I see it, a more sendmailish solution would be to use a little > sendmail-fu and make it so that sendmail checks for local user at smtp > time, but delivers to cyrus at deliver time.  I don't have such fu, but > I see now as a good enough

Re: Possible sendmail misconfiguration to deliver to cyrus

2006-12-04 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 09:23:47PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote: >>Error" because the user doesn't exist. I have been googling and looking >>at m4 code and trying to figure out what I can do to make sendmail check >>the user at SMTP connect time the way it

Re: Possible sendmail misconfiguration to deliver to cyrus

2006-12-04 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] > My rudimentary understanding of sendmail macros makes me think that > instead of checking for users locally, it's checking for user cyrus > locally (which always succeeds), so the email is accepted for any user. > If it's a problem with the older ver

Re: Possible sendmail misconfiguration to deliver to cyrus

2006-12-04 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 07:58:02PM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote: > at m4 code and trying to figure out what I can do to make sendmail check > the user at SMTP connect time the way it does if I configure sendmail to > deliver to a regular mbox mail spool. Here's what a quick Google found: http://comme

Re: Possible sendmail misconfiguration to deliver to cyrus

2006-12-03 Thread Jo Rhett
Todd Lyons wrote: Error" because the user doesn't exist. I have been googling and looking at m4 code and trying to figure out what I can do to make sendmail check the user at SMTP connect time the way it does if I configure sendmail to deliver to a regular mbox mail spool. Can you create a lis

Re: Possible sendmail misconfiguration to deliver to cyrus

2006-12-03 Thread websrvr
On Dec 3, 2006, at 22:58:02, Todd Lyons wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm looking at a cyrus limitation right now. I'm really thinking this is not cyrus' problem. I'm trying to figure out if it's actually a sendmail limitation or a sendmail config error on my part. Th

Possible sendmail misconfiguration to deliver to cyrus

2006-12-03 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm looking at a cyrus limitation right now. I'm really thinking this is not cyrus' problem. I'm trying to figure out if it's actually a sendmail limitation or a sendmail config error on my part. The problem I'm working through became illuminated wh