On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:31:39AM +0600, subscript...@innter.net wrote:
> Bron Gondwana wrote :
>
> > I think it's the 32bit vs 64bit issue. There's an open bug for it in
> > bugzilla.
>
> Thanks for info. I found this bug (3381). But now I have another question.
> I have 2 alternatives.
>
> 1
Bron Gondwana wrote :
> I think it's the 32bit vs 64bit issue. There's an open bug for it in
> bugzilla.
Thanks for info. I found this bug (3381). But now I have another question.
I have 2 alternatives.
1. I can change perl script that to use 32bit int (thanks to Leena Heino).
2. I can use patc
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, subscript...@innter.net wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have found that C and Perl versions (tools/rehash) of dir_hash_c have
> different results. For part of mailboxes.
>
> Perl code :
>
> $n = 0;
> foreach my $b (split(/ */, $auth_user)) {
>$n = (($n << 3) ^ ($n >> 5)) ^ ord($b);
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:22:05AM +0600, subscript...@innter.net wrote:
> This is wrong.
> Can someone explain that is wrong in perl version and how to fix this?
I think it's the 32bit vs 64bit issue. There's an open bug for it in
bugzilla.
(personally, I think fulldirhash is wrong, but that's
Hello,
I have found that C and Perl versions (tools/rehash) of dir_hash_c have
different results. For part of mailboxes.
Perl code :
$n = 0;
foreach my $b (split(/ */, $auth_user)) {
$n = (($n << 3) ^ ($n >> 5)) ^ ord($b);
}
$h = chr(ord('A') + ($n % 23));
./mbpath user.biz53p2
Result : A
