Kendrick Vargas wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Rob Siemborski wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Kendrick Vargas wrote:
stores it's messages. If you configured sendmail and uw-imap to store it's
messages in maildir format (which I believe you can), then you'd have a
real test for testing the performance
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Kendrick Vargas wrote:
>
> > I always thought it was configurable to do do that... uw's cclient library
> > can read a bunch of different format mailboxes so I figured uw-imapd would
> > be able to read them, it is after all just an
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Kendrick Vargas wrote:
>
> > stores it's messages. If you configured sendmail and uw-imap to store it's
> > messages in maildir format (which I believe you can), then you'd have a
> > real test for testing the performance of one ove
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Kendrick Vargas wrote:
> I always thought it was configurable to do do that... uw's cclient library
> can read a bunch of different format mailboxes so I figured uw-imapd would
> be able to read them, it is after all just another mailbox. I remember
> seeing, once, something s
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Kendrick Vargas wrote:
> stores it's messages. If you configured sendmail and uw-imap to store it's
> messages in maildir format (which I believe you can), then you'd have a
> real test for testing the performance of one over the other. But at that
> point, the configuration t
What he said! UW-IMAP in sealed mode is supposed to perform fairly well,
but you don't get sieve, murder, partitions etc..
Having a sealed system in a non unix end-user environment is the way to
go. Our users have no idea what kind of server they are talking to --
just that it speaks IMAP ;)
K
Comments are based on Cyrus and wu-imap using mbx format --
Just reading mailboxes isn't a good test.. Cyrus _really_ excels when
you start do a lot of things to the same mailbox at the same time. For
example, deleting email and delivering new email to the same mailbox at
the same time. Try putti
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Tuomas Toropainen wrote:
> The problem is that wu-imapd seems to perform much better than cyrus.
> Cyrus version is 2.1.16, compiled with default database options. Syslog is
> not logging debug messages, and has synchronous logging disabled (-). Both
> systems have 500 test us
Tuomas Toropainen wrote:
I have been running some performance tests on my cyrus test installation.
The computer is not very fast, but my intention was just try how cyrus
performs compared to wu-imap on the same computer. It's 350Mhz P2 with
256MB memory and 4,5GB scsi disk. OS is redhat 9 and fi
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Tuomas Toropainen wrote:
> What am I doing wrong, or is this computer just too slow for cyrus to
> perform well? Or are the default databases so poor that they cayse this?
>
> Complete results are at
> http://www.cc.jyu.fi/~tjt/imaptestit/cyrus/results.html (cyrus)
> and http:
I have been running some performance tests on my cyrus test installation.
The computer is not very fast, but my intention was just try how cyrus
performs compared to wu-imap on the same computer. It's 350Mhz P2 with
256MB memory and 4,5GB scsi disk. OS is redhat 9 and filesystem ext3. I'm
using m
11 matches
Mail list logo
