Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:10:27AM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
>> Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>
>>> Bron ( P.S. isn't it about time for a 2.3.12? I'm getting sick
>>>of posting skiplist patches to people running the
>>>lastest and having issues! )
>> Yes, it probab
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:10:27AM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
>> Bron ( P.S. isn't it about time for a 2.3.12? I'm getting sick
>>of posting skiplist patches to people running the
>>lastest and having issues! )
>
> Yes, it probably is. Perhaps I'll make a
Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Bron ( P.S. isn't it about time for a 2.3.12? I'm getting sick
>of posting skiplist patches to people running the
>lastest and having issues! )
Yes, it probably is. Perhaps I'll make a pre-release today while I
troll bugzilla for any showstoppers.
--
Ke
I've put a header on the patch describing the bug. Basically,
the result code from mailbox_open_locked() wasn't being tested
sufficiently, and hence the new mailbox name would be created
in mailboxes.db even though the files were no longer available
to be copied - causing sync bailouts and IOERROR
