On 2014-11-01 21:29, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> We already have one at FastMail to stop users setting an 'anyone' ACL.
>
I think this may already be in upstream, unless you're talking about a
different implementation/solution?
http://git.cyrusimap.org/cyrus-imapd/tree/lib/imapoptions#n179
>> >
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014, at 01:45 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
> On 2014-10-22 23:02, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > Yes, that means a massive change, instead of internally:
> >
> > example.com!user.foo.bar <=> user/foo/b...@example.com (which is a
> > million ways of bogus) we would have
On 2014-10-22 23:02, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Yes, that means a massive change, instead of internally:
>
> example.com!user.foo.bar <=> user/foo/b...@example.com (which is a
> million ways of bogus) we would have:
>
> user.foo@example^com.bar <=> user/f...@example.com/bar
>
> Or in alt namspace:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014, at 12:23 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Bron Gondwana
> wrote:
>> Yeah, I'm afraid so.
>>
>> It's going to kind of suck for FastMail customers as much as anyone
>> actually - since that's what we use! But here's the thing:
>>
>> a) it will be po
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Yeah, I'm afraid so.
>
> It's going to kind of suck for FastMail customers as much as anyone
> actually - since that's what we use! But here's the thing:
>
> a) it will be possible to switch to the netnews way if you want
> b) but if you ha
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, at 09:18 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> If you DON'T have virtdomains, or the users are all in the default
> domain, then it will keep working just the same. I guess we could have
> a config option "strip domain if same" or something, and get the same
> display as what we have no
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, at 09:03 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Bron Gondwana
> wrote:
>> __
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, at 08:55 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Bron Gondwana
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> We only set quotas on individual mailboxes
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, at 08:55 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> We only set quotas on individual mailboxes so that wouldn't be a problem.
> We also don't have sieve scripts except per-
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, at 08:55 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Bron Gondwana
> wrote:
>
> We only set quotas on individual mailboxes so that wouldn't be a
> problem. We also don't have sieve scripts except per-mailbox, so
> ditto there.
Sounds like you'll be fine.
>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> So Cyrus has three different types of domain split:
>
> * none at all
> * "on/yes" => weird reverse DNS hackery
> * userid => login with domain.
>
> As part of finally switching to unixheirarchysep: on (yay) and better key
> format (double y
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, at 05:39 AM, Clement Hermann (nodens) wrote:
> On 22/10/2014 23:02, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> So if I understand this correctly, it means we could still have "global"
> shared folders but not shared folders limited in a domain namespace like
> we have now ?
Correct.
> if so, it
On 22/10/2014 23:02, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> The problem is, it means you can't set quotas per domain, you can't have
> sieve scripts per domain, and most of all - you can't have shared folders in
> a domain.
>
> example.com!shared.stuff worked fine, but
>
> shared.example^com.stuff would be weird
So Cyrus has three different types of domain split:
* none at all
* "on/yes" => weird reverse DNS hackery
* userid => login with domain.
As part of finally switching to unixheirarchysep: on (yay) and better key
format (double yay) I want to change the overarching "split users into separate
doma
13 matches
Mail list logo
