Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-22 Thread Thomas Fritz
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 20:52, Lawrence Greenfield wrote: >From: Fritz Test <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: 09 Feb 2003 11:25:37 +0100 > [...] >With help of the analysis of Jeremy (Thanks) I patched the function >mkgmtime, such that it works for me now. The problem is, that gmtime(&t) >

Re: Hasso Meyer-Jordan [Was: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12]

2003-02-11 Thread Hasso Meyer-Jordan
Hi Ramiro! > > (I wouldn't be surprised about brain-dead Microsoft developers! ;-))) > > Perhaps badly payed immigrants of India [like unskilled worker]. ) > > > Please, please, in the future try to keep you stupid racist > comments out of this technical discussion mailing list. Sorry for your

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-11 Thread Hasso Meyer-Jordan
Hi Avtar Gill! > > (I wouldn't be surprised about brain-dead Microsoft developers! ;-))) > > Perhaps badly payed immigrants of India [like unskilled worker]. ) > > I can't speak for the administrators of this list but as a normal user of > Cyrus IMAPD I turn to this mailing list for technical hel

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-11 Thread Avtar Gill
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Hasso Meyer-Jordan wrote: > (I wouldn't be surprised about brain-dead Microsoft developers! ;-))) > Perhaps badly payed immigrants of India [like unskilled worker]. ) I can't speak for the administrators of this list but as a normal user of Cyrus IMAPD I turn to this mailing

Hasso Meyer-Jordan [Was: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12]

2003-02-11 Thread Ramiro Morales
On 11 Feb 2003 at 18:32, Hasso Meyer-Jordan wrote: > > (I wouldn't be surprised about brain-dead Microsoft developers! ;-))) > Perhaps badly payed immigrants of India [like unskilled worker]. ) > > Cheers, Hasso > Please, please, in the future try to keep you stupid racist comments out of thi

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-11 Thread Hasso Meyer-Jordan
Hi Ken, Per! > I just did some testing myself with Outlook 2000 and Outlook Express 6. > I couldn't get either client to hang after doing APPENDs (with IDLE > enabled). OE does close the connection after calling IDLE after the > final APPEND however. > > I'm not convinced that this is a server

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Jay Levitt
> I just did some testing myself with Outlook 2000 and Outlook Express 6. > I couldn't get either client to hang after doing APPENDs (with IDLE > enabled). OE does close the connection after calling IDLE after the > final APPEND however. FWIW, and not that it matters in this case, OE and Outlook

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
From: Fritz Test <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 09 Feb 2003 11:25:37 +0100 [...] With help of the analysis of Jeremy (Thanks) I patched the function mkgmtime, such that it works for me now. The problem is, that gmtime(&t) returns a null pointer for my 64-bit system if t is out of some ran

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Ken Murchison
Per Steinar Iversen wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Per Steinar Iversen wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > > > The obvious difference here is that Cyrus 2.1 supports the IDLE > > > extension and Outlook is using it. I'm not sure why the client would be > > > IDLEing i

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Per Steinar Iversen
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Per Steinar Iversen wrote: > On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > The obvious difference here is that Cyrus 2.1 supports the IDLE > > extension and Outlook is using it. I'm not sure why the client would be > > IDLEing in between APPENDs, but I've grown accustomed

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Per Steinar Iversen
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Ken Murchison wrote: > The obvious difference here is that Cyrus 2.1 supports the IDLE > extension and Outlook is using it. I'm not sure why the client would be > IDLEing in between APPENDs, but I've grown accustomed to seeing silly > behavior from Outlook and Netscape. What

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Ken Murchison
The obvious difference here is that Cyrus 2.1 supports the IDLE extension and Outlook is using it. I'm not sure why the client would be IDLEing in between APPENDs, but I've grown accustomed to seeing silly behavior from Outlook and Netscape. What method for IDLE did you configure with? (doing a '

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Per Steinar Iversen
On 8 Feb 2003, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > Outlook can behave very strangely sometimes. I have certainly noticed that the main method for handling IMAP errors and problems is to just freeze :-) -psi

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Per Steinar Iversen
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Lawrence Greenfield wrote: >Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:44:17 +0100 (CET) >From: Per Steinar Iversen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I just tried to copy a large number of messages from an Outlook PST file >to an IMAP server running Cyrus 2.1.12, but Outlook 2002 SP2 would

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-08 Thread Jeremy Rumpf
On Saturday 08 February 2003 03:19 pm, Lawrence Greenfield wrote: >Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:44:17 +0100 (CET) >From: Per Steinar Iversen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I just tried to copy a large number of messages from an Outlook PST file >to an IMAP server running Cyrus 2.1.12, but Outlo

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-08 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:44:17 +0100 (CET) From: Per Steinar Iversen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I just tried to copy a large number of messages from an Outlook PST file to an IMAP server running Cyrus 2.1.12, but Outlook 2002 SP2 would not cooperate. As test I then tried copying to an old

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-08 Thread Fabian Fagerholm
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 16:44, Per Steinar Iversen wrote: > There is no problem for Outlook connecting, making folders, reading > messages etc against Cyrus 2.1.12, but the copying operation always fail - > Outlook seem to hang. It uses no CPU, does no IO from the PST file and > says nothing to the I

Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-08 Thread Per Steinar Iversen
I just tried to copy a large number of messages from an Outlook PST file to an IMAP server running Cyrus 2.1.12, but Outlook 2002 SP2 would not cooperate. As test I then tried copying to an old Cyrus 1.6.22 server - that works! Surely the problem is with Outlook, not Cyrus, still it would be int