No, this is how it works in any remotely recent version.
Larry
From: "Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:08:48 -
I've looked for the answer to this for a while, but if I've missed it =
because I can't see the wood for the trees then apologies in advance. =
Ba
Hi,
I've looked for the answer to this for a while, but
if I've missed it because I can't see the wood for the trees then apologies in
advance. Basically I would prefer to have all my users on one level "../user"
rather than in the "../user/a..z" sub-dirs - is this still possible as the
se
