Re: Large email account

2005-02-26 Thread David Lang
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Prasanna Buddhika wrote: Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:14:17 -0800 (PST) From: Prasanna Buddhika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu Subject: Large email account Hi, I have win2000 server running exchange 2000 server. There are 2 large email accounts (

Re: Large email account

2005-02-26 Thread Hamish
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:14, Prasanna Buddhika wrote: > Hi, > I have win2000 server running exchange 2000 server. > There are 2 large email accounts (70 emails in a > single account) which we don't want to delete. But I > want to move these 2 accounts to Linux machine with > cyrus-imap se

Re: Software Quality rant (was Re: Large email account)

2004-12-21 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Earl R Shannon wrote: > I don't want to sound like I'm defending poorly written software. BUT, > If it doesn't look pretty people won't want to use it. And if no one is > going to use your software, why write it? What do you want to use to store your email? Cyrus or MS Exchan

Re: Software Quality rant (was Re: Large email account)

2004-12-21 Thread Earl R Shannon
Hello, I don't want to sound like I'm defending poorly written software. BUT, If it doesn't look pretty people won't want to use it. And if no one is going to use your software, why write it? Again, I'm not defending insecure and otherwise poorly written software. I'm saying that users want pretty

Re: Software Quality rant (was Re: Large email account)

2004-12-21 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Michael Loftis wrote: > And I have to agree with Henrique here, and not just because he keeps Cyrus > backported for my older Woody installs :) Heh. Thanks :) > Working at a web host we deal with all of the major PHP packages. I won't > name any names, but most of them are

Re: Large email account

2004-12-21 Thread Simon Matter
> That'd be a significant change for the better if T-bird finally did it > right. I'll have to ask the T-bird users at the office to get ahold of > the > latest version an see. I know the last time most of them upgraded they > still couldn't look into our support archive easily (20k+) because it'

Re: Large email account

2004-12-21 Thread Jason DiCioccio
Hello! On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:05:45 -0700, Michael Loftis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --On Tuesday, December 21, 2004 07:59 +0100 Simon Matter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The nice thing about Thunderbird is that it works fine. Same goes for > > recent kmail versions. Mulberry and PI

Re: Software Quality rant (was Re: Large email account)

2004-12-21 Thread Michael Loftis
--On Tuesday, December 21, 2004 08:53 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Simon Matter wrote: The nice thing about Thunderbird is that it works fine. Same goes for recent kmail versions. Mulberry and PINE may do it better, but they don't look better.

Re: Large email account

2004-12-21 Thread Michael Loftis
--On Tuesday, December 21, 2004 07:59 +0100 Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The nice thing about Thunderbird is that it works fine. Same goes for recent kmail versions. Mulberry and PINE may do it better, but they don't look better. That'd be a significant change for the better if T-bird

Re: Software Quality rant (was Re: Large email account)

2004-12-21 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Simon Matter wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Simon Matter wrote: > >> The nice thing about Thunderbird is that it works fine. Same goes for > >> recent kmail versions. Mulberry and PINE may do it better, but they > >> don't look better. > > > > We are talking Unix here (industr

Re: Software Quality rant (was Re: Large email account)

2004-12-21 Thread Simon Matter
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Simon Matter wrote: >> The nice thing about Thunderbird is that it works fine. Same goes for >> recent kmail versions. Mulberry and PINE may do it better, but they >> don't >> look better. > > We are talking Unix here (industrial strenght tools, focus on doing I replied to s

Software Quality rant (was Re: Large email account)

2004-12-21 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Simon Matter wrote: > The nice thing about Thunderbird is that it works fine. Same goes for > recent kmail versions. Mulberry and PINE may do it better, but they don't > look better. We are talking Unix here (industrial strenght tools, focus on doing things right, etc) or are

Re: Large email account

2004-12-20 Thread Simon Matter
> > > --On Monday, December 20, 2004 16:14 -0800 Prasanna Buddhika > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I have win2000 server running exchange 2000 server. >> There are 2 large email accounts (70 emails in a >> single account) which we don't want to delete. But I >> want to move these 2 acc

Re: Large email account

2004-12-20 Thread Michael Loftis
--On Monday, December 20, 2004 16:14 -0800 Prasanna Buddhika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have win2000 server running exchange 2000 server. There are 2 large email accounts (70 emails in a single account) which we don't want to delete. But I want to move these 2 accounts to Linux machine

Re: Large email account

2004-12-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Prasanna Buddhika wrote: > if I use cyrus-imap to retriew (sync) the email it takes 30 minutes. But > after sync it?s fast. Only problem is when ever I logged off the system > and log back in to the system again I have to wait 30 minutes to access > the mail. Can anyone have a

Large email account

2004-12-20 Thread Prasanna Buddhika
Hi, I have win2000 server running exchange 2000 server. There are 2 large email accounts (70 emails in a single account) which we don't want to delete. But I want to move these 2 accounts to Linux machine with cyrus-imap server. Migration went very well. Only problem is the speed. When the 2 ma