Re: LMTP vs SMTP

2000-12-18 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:43:31 + From: Cillian Sharkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] I couldn't give a definitive answer to him as to why LMTP is used apart from saying that LMTP is more a "local" protocol, then a "across the Internet protocol" (SMTP). So my question is, what a

Re: LMTP vs SMTP

2000-12-14 Thread Ørnulf Nielsen
>> LMTP will send the message only once to cyrus and allow cyrus to deliver the >> message internally to the list of recipients provided during the LMTP >> exchange with sendmail. One nice feature that this provides to cyrus is >> single-message store, where the message is stored in the first reci

Re: LMTP vs SMTP

2000-12-14 Thread Cillian Sharkey
Randall S. Winchester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RFC2033 is only 7 pages of which the first 5 are of interest, and is > fairly light reading as RFC's go. You should take a look; > http://www.imc.org/rfc2033 I just looked at the RFC - and it is suprisingly short. I'll read it in more detail late

Re: LMTP vs SMTP

2000-12-13 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Nadeem Hasan wrote: > "Scot W. Hetzel" wrote: > > > > > > LMTP will send the message only once to cyrus and allow cyrus to deliver the > > message internally to the list of recipients provided during the LMTP > > exchange with sendmail. One nice feature that this provides t

Re: LMTP vs SMTP

2000-12-13 Thread Nadeem Hasan
"Scot W. Hetzel" wrote: > > > LMTP will send the message only once to cyrus and allow cyrus to deliver the > message internally to the list of recipients provided during the LMTP > exchange with sendmail. One nice feature that this provides to cyrus is > single-message store, where the message i

Re: LMTP vs SMTP

2000-12-13 Thread +archive . info-cyrus
If you watch the protocols, one difference should become apparent. With SMTP, after the `.' concluding the `DATA' command, you'll only get one response, no matter how many recipients were listed for that message. However, with LMTP, you get a response for each recipient, in the order that the rec

Re: LMTP vs SMTP

2000-12-13 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Cillian Sharkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I was mentioning to a friend how Cyrus now recieves messages over LMTP. Not > being familiar with the protocol (nor I), he skimmed over the LMTP RFC. From > this brief read, he came to the conclusion that LMTP was more or less > redundant, considering

LMTP vs SMTP

2000-12-13 Thread Cillian Sharkey
Hi Folks, I was mentioning to a friend how Cyrus now recieves messages over LMTP. Not being familiar with the protocol (nor I), he skimmed over the LMTP RFC. From this brief read, he came to the conclusion that LMTP was more or less redundant, considering its close similarity to SMTP. I couldn't