> >>One question. While it is nice to have Kerberos 4/5 authentication, which
> >>IMAP clients support it? Which one would you suggest?
> >I know that pine & Ximian Evolution do via GSSAPI
> There's also a KERBEROS_IV patch for pine, and Mulberry can do atleast
> KERBEROS_IV.
I did a Kerberos V pr
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > One question. While it is nice to have Kerberos 4/5 authentication, which
> > IMAP clients support it? Which one would you suggest?
>
> I know that pine & Ximian Evolution do via GSSAPI
There's also a KERBEROS_IV patch for pine, and Mulberry can
> One question. While it is nice to have Kerberos 4/5 authentication, which
> IMAP clients support it? Which one would you suggest?
I know that pine & Ximian Evolution do via GSSAPI
> Etienne Goyer told me they were using "PLAIN -> saslauthd -> Kerberos 5".
That is more of a mail server configur
Hi all.
One question. While it is nice to have Kerberos 4/5
authentication, which IMAP clients support it? Which one would you
suggest?
Etienne Goyer told me they were using "PLAIN ->
saslauthd -> Kerberos 5".
Seeing how Microsoft pushes for Kerberos in their
Active Directory, I'd expe
