On Oct 29, 2004, at 10:45, Michael Sims wrote:
Which version of Cyrus IMAP is the patch intended for? Also, have you
seen a
reduction in the number of timeout errors ("IMAP server has closed
connection") with
this patch applied? TIA...
Good questions.
This was against 2.2.8 and, yes, the client
Bill McGonigle wrote:
>> Doug Koobs wrote:
>>> After some more research, and some emails exchanges from others that
>>> have been troubleshooting OL2002's IMAP problems, I think I have a
>>> better idea of what the problem. It seems that Outlook can't handle
>>> responses as quickly as Cyrus sends
On Apr 13, 2004, at 11:44, Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doug Koobs wrote:
> After some more research, and some emails exchanges from others that
> have been troubleshooting OL2002's IMAP problems, I think I have a
> better idea of what the problem. It seems that Outlook can't handle
> r
--On Tuesday, April 13, 2004 12:47 -0700 Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry for the dumb question, but are you certain that plain was enabled in
sasl? It's not enabled by default, you have to explicitly configure it
during compile time. That might be why the mismatch.
Yes I am because
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 12:45:55PM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
> Reproducing this is difficult, but it DOES happen. And when it does SASL
> thinks that it never saw AUTH PLAIN in the output from lmtpd, when looking
> at the protocol traces/dumps from over the wire it clearly WAS sent and
> arr
--On Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:08 -0700 Peter Friend
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wasn't able to view this link. At a protocol level the problem doesn't
make much sense to me, since Outlook has to read everything that Cyrus is
sending it, regardless of how fast it is being sent. The data would
> You say 'problems' what more precisely are the symptoms?
> Sorry I seem to
> have missed them on the threads.
Sometimes I forget to hit "reply all" instead of just "reply" for this list,
so that may be why you missed some :)
We have two problems with Outlook 2002 SP3 right now. The crucial
On Apr 13, 2004, at 10:17 AM, Doug Koobs wrote:
I should have said that Outlook is too slow. The problem here is
definitely
not with Cyrus, I was just hoping for a workaround in Cyrus to
compensate
for Outlook's problem.
Here is a thread from a NG between a couple of people suffering from
this
--On Tuesday, April 13, 2004 13:43 -0400 Doug Koobs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andy,
We are only having the problem when selecting folders that have thousands
of emails in it (which, of course, would only be the executives!). The
version is OL2002, SP3. OE and Squirrelmail have no problem at a
> Let me chime in here to say that we have Outlook users running a wide
> variety of versions, but I've never heard of a problem like
> this from our
> users. If you have an exact version of Outlook and the steps
> to repeat
> this problem, I could try to replicate it here...
Andy,
We are onl
Let me chime in here to say that we have Outlook users running a wide
variety of versions, but I've never heard of a problem like this from our
users. If you have an exact version of Outlook and the steps to repeat
this problem, I could try to replicate it here...
Andy
On Tue, 13 Apr 20
> You're right, this is a hack. Its funny that the problem is that the
> server is "too fast". Where have you ever heard that before?
I should have said that Outlook is too slow. The problem here is definitely
not with Cyrus, I was just hoping for a workaround in Cyrus to compensate
for Outloo
Doug Koobs wrote:
After some more research, and some emails exchanges from others that
have been troubleshooting OL2002's IMAP problems, I think I have a
better idea of what the problem. It seems that Outlook can't handle
responses as quickly as Cyrus sends them, and it doesn't queue them. It
j
Title: Message
After some more
research, and some emails exchanges from others that have been troubleshooting
OL2002's IMAP problems, I think I have a better idea of what the problem. It
seems that Outlook can't handle responses as quickly as Cyrus sends them, and it
doesn't queue them. It j
14 matches
Mail list logo
