Re: INTERNALDATE one hour in future for sent message

2006-07-12 Thread Jim Brett
Unix systems should be run in GMT/UTC (almost the same thing; GMT is _not_ British time"). You then use $TZ in the environment, or some OS-dependent way of setting 'localtime' (eg, a symlink /etc/localtime, or some other method) to let programs show the time in the local zone. That's normally

Re: INTERNALDATE one hour in future for sent message

2006-06-28 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2006-06-28 at 16:43 -0400, Jim Brett wrote: > Thanks, your response is greatly appreciated. Here's OS info: > > # uname -a > SunOS machine.company.com 5.8 Generic_117350-13 sun4u sparc > SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240 Edit /etc/TIMEZONE, zone information available in /usr/share/lib/zoneinfo/ $ man -s 4

Re: INTERNALDATE one hour in future for sent message

2006-06-28 Thread Jim Brett
Thanks, your response is greatly appreciated. Here's OS info: # uname -a SunOS machine.company.com 5.8 Generic_117350-13 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240 Phil wrote: On 2006-06-28 at 10:21 -0400, Jim wrote: INTERNALDATE (hence received date?) one hour in future for sent message. Uni

Re: INTERNALDATE one hour in future for sent message

2006-06-28 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2006-06-28 at 10:21 -0400, Jim Brett wrote: > INTERNALDATE (hence received date?) one hour in future for sent > message. Unix systems should be run in GMT/UTC (almost the same thing; GMT is _not_ "British time"). You then use $TZ in the environment, or some OS-dependent way of setting 'localt

INTERNALDATE one hour in future for sent message

2006-06-28 Thread Jim Brett
INTERNALDATE (hence received date?) one hour in future for sent message. I realize that a received date on a message in sent folder doesn't really have meaning but, if a user moves from sent to inbox (or trash), then clients (including outlook and outlook express) sort by received date which i