Yeah i noticed. But I find it a little nicer.
Just used lmtp:unix:/var/imap/socket/lmtp
Seems to work just dandy actually, much easier then TCP. Althought to be
honest TCP isnt a bad idea, having postfix on 1 server accepting the mail
and sending it to another server for storage.
Of Course
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2002 17:27:10 -0700,
> Scott M Likens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sml) writes:
sml> Ahh...
sml> Since the LMTP is well quite out of date i'm more or less trying to
sml> figure out the password maps and everything i would need to setup.
sml> I guess i'll wait for someone to upda
> On Wed, 15 May 2002 20:04:27 -0300,
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (hdmh) writes:
hdmh> On Wed, 15 May 2002, Amos Gouaux wrote:
>> to take advantage of single instance delivery. (The local delivery
>> agent in Postfix can only deliver one recipient at a time.)
hdmh>
lol sorry.. Clock seems to be resetting for some reason on my computer and
i'm not sure why.
Battery is fine and all... just every time i reboot it looses it.
--On Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:49 AM +0200 Luc Brouard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please change your system time (date !) ...
>
> On
Please change your system time (date !) ...
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 05:27:10PM -0700, Scott M Likens wrote:
Thanks
Luc
Ahh...
Since the LMTP is well quite out of date i'm more or less trying to figure
out the password maps and everything i would need to setup. I guess i'll
wait for someone to update it and take another crack at it.
--On Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:48 PM -0500 Amos Gouaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Amos Gouaux wrote:
> to take advantage of single instance delivery. (The local delivery
> agent in Postfix can only deliver one recipient at a time.)
Well, use the lmtp transport, then. It can deliver through an unix socket
just fine.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One d
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:23:55 -0700,
> Scott M Likens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sml) writes:
sml> So then i can assume it would be more proper to do LMTP over Unix
sml> Socket? I can do either, i just am trying to find the best method to
sml> do this.
The properness depends on your environme
So then i can assume it would be more proper to do LMTP over Unix Socket?
I can do either, i just am trying to find the best method to do this.
Thanks
--On Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:10 AM -0500 Amos Gouaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 May 2002 12:09:14 -0600,
>> Scott M L
> On Tue, 14 May 2002 12:09:14 -0600,
> Scott M Likens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sml) writes:
sml> May 13 15:52:32 shell postfix/lmtp[21546]: [ID 197553 mail.info]
sml> 614D48A84E: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
sml> relay=shell.bourg.net[207.229.76.2], delay=1, status=deferred (host
sml> shell.bourg
I had attempted to do LMTP with Postfix, but got an interesting error.
Can anyone help me? I would prefer to use LMTP over the Deliver Command if
possible.
Thanks
May 13 15:52:32 shell postfix/lmtp[21546]: [ID 197553 mail.info]
614D48A84E: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=shell.bou
11 matches
Mail list logo
