On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 04:34:21PM +0100, Eric Luyten wrote:
> On Fri, February 19, 2010 4:13 pm, Patrick Boutilier wrote:
> > On 02/19/2010 11:03 AM, Marco van Putten wrote:
> >
> >> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I have been reading the thread about using "xfer" to migra
On 02/19/2010 11:34 AM, Eric Luyten wrote:
On Fri, February 19, 2010 4:13 pm, Patrick Boutilier wrote:
On 02/19/2010 11:03 AM, Marco van Putten wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
Hi All,
I have been reading the thread about using "xfer" to migrate to a
different server or to use imapsync instead.
On Fri, February 19, 2010 4:13 pm, Patrick Boutilier wrote:
> On 02/19/2010 11:03 AM, Marco van Putten wrote:
>
>> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>
>>> I have been reading the thread about using "xfer" to migrate to a
>>> different server or to use imapsync instead. Both methods appear to
On 02/19/2010 11:03 AM, Marco van Putten wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
Hi All,
I have been reading the thread about using "xfer" to migrate to a different
server or to use imapsync instead.
Both methods appear to require some additional work and I would prefer to
simply copy the data across instea
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been reading the thread about using "xfer" to migrate to a different
> server or to use imapsync instead.
> Both methods appear to require some additional work and I would prefer to
> simply copy the data across instead of using synchronization tools on l
Hi All,
I have been reading the thread about using "xfer" to migrate to a different
server or to use imapsync instead.
Both methods appear to require some additional work and I would prefer to
simply copy the data across instead of using synchronization tools on live
servers. (It's not a requir
