> On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 18:43:21 -0400 (EDT),
> Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (rs) writes:
rs> The key about the usability of the filesystem is that file locks need to
rs> be obeyed throughout the entire cluster, and mmap() needs to be efficient
rs> (and able to deal with read() and wri
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ben Carter wrote:
> > This is not the case. Simple DNS round-robining is sufficient.
>
> How is simple DNS round-robin sufficient? More than one MUA caches the DNS
> lookups for its mail servers. I know that at least one version of
> Netscape Communicator used to. It probab
--On Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:43 PM -0400 Rob Siemborski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:r
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ben Carter wrote:
and an MTA on each cluster member, because with the murder
configuration, you probably have to end up with a load-balancing switch
in front of murder front-end machines
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ben Carter wrote:
> and an MTA on each cluster member, because with the murder
> configuration, you probably have to end up with a load-balancing switch
> in front of murder front-end machines which in turn are in front of the
This is not the case. Simple DNS round-robining i
We currently have a single IMAP server and we are considering two
Solaris 8/9 HA Cyrus configurations:
#1. IMAP Aggregator (murder)
#2. Cyrus on a Veritas cluster (common file system with parallel service
groups)
After looking at the murder design, it seems to me that it's a lot
more compli
