On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 04:12:11PM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> All the patches mentioned here are available for download at:
>
> http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/
>
>
> We've been busy working on a bunch of cyrus issues since I last
> posted. In particular things we have hit cleaning up from th
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, David Carter wrote:
Ah, have_uuid is new in 2.3. That line definitely needs to move, but I
think that the message_uuid_master_init() call should stay where it is.
Or even (as per the fastmail patch).
--
David Carter Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uni
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, John Capo wrote:
masterconf_getsection() calls add_service() which inits the service
structures with have_uuid but have_uuid is not set till after the
services are initialized.
Ah, have_uuid is new in 2.3. That line definitely needs to move, but I
think that the message_
With hindsight I should probably have defined message UUIDs to be the full
MD5 hash: 128 bits isn't that much worse than 96 bits per message. What is
the CPU overhead like for calculating MD5 sums for everything on the fly?
That would have been nice, and from an integrity point of view as well,
Quoting John Capo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Quoting David Carter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > Is MASTER_UUID_FILE owned by a user other than cyrus on your systems? I
> > can't see any other obvious reason that moving message_uuid_master_init()
> > up a few lines would help. service_create() is bind
Quoting David Carter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Is MASTER_UUID_FILE owned by a user other than cyrus on your systems? I
> can't see any other obvious reason that moving message_uuid_master_init()
> up a few lines would help. service_create() is binding ports, which
> obviously has to happen as ro
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:09:04 + (GMT), "David Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Rob Mueller wrote:
>
> > May not be true, but:
> >
> >> Is it safe? - we calulated that with one billion messages you have a one
> >> in 1 billion chance of a birthday collision (two ran
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Rob Mueller wrote:
May not be true, but:
Is it safe? - we calulated that with one billion messages you have a one
in 1 billion chance of a birthday collision (two random messages with
the same UUID).
Is true.
Fair enough.
With hindsight I should probably have de
Is it safe? - we calulated that with one billion messages you have a one
in 1 billion chance of a birthday collision (two random messages with
the same UUID). They then have to get in the same MAILBOXES collection
to sync_client to affect each other anyway.
Isn't the case: UUIDs span al
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Bron Gondwana wrote:
* Make UUIDs work at all. The initialisation order of the UUID
subsystem was wrong, so we had very few messages with a non-zero UUID.
message_uuid_master_init() should only be called after become_cyrus().
Every time that message_uuid_master_next_chi
All the patches mentioned here are available for download at:
http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/
We've been busy working on a bunch of cyrus issues since I last
posted. In particular things we have hit cleaning up from the
"sync_server left files lying around after a bail out that caused
random me
11 matches
Mail list logo
