Hello,
I've installed Cyrus 2.4.17 but can't find METADATA support in the
capabilities, only ANNOTATEMORE is displayed.
Is there a specific version somewhere in git for using METADATA or did I
miss something in the configuration ?
--
kael
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List
Hello,
I've installed Cyrus 2.4.17 but can't find METADATA support in the
capabilities, only ANNOTATEMORE is displayed.
Is there a specific version somewhere in git for using METADATA or did I
miss something in the configuration ?
--
kael
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List
This is just how UMich upgrade from 2.2.x to 2.3.x. We contributed a
number of changes to 2.3.x to facilitate the functionality. I would
expect it to "just work", but you should of course rigorously test
it. In particular, you might want to test ACLs, quotas, annotations,
POP, and other
Hello all,
Sorry if this has been answered or is an obvious place like the
documentation, but I've not had any luck finding information on this.
Is there a way to have a Cyrus murder that has mixed Cyrus versions in
it? That is to say, have one backend server running 2.2.13 and another
runnin
TOUZEAU DAVID wrote:
I'm developping a script;
I need to check the cyrus-imap version by command-line without check
repositories packages (deb ou rpm) .
I there any way to do this ?
like cyrus-master -v to get version (but it doesn't work);
echo . logout|nc localhost 143|grep server
C
I'm developping a script;
I need to check the cyrus-imap version by command-line without check
repositories packages (deb ou rpm) .
I there any way to do this ?
like cyrus-master -v to get version (but it doesn't work);
--
David Touzeau -- Linux Ubuntu Dapper 6.0.6
Fr
Hello,
I have following problem, I recently did migrating from one machine
to another and installed version 2.2.12 on new machine, to do migration,
I took following steps, made the same mailboxes scheme (including
subfolders) on new machine (just empty mailboxes) with cyradm, then
copied ma
On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 02:47, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Security by obscurity never works. Do you really think an attacker
> would be deterred by the version number that he sees? He'll probably
> try his attack regardless of the version reported.
I humbly disagree. I think it depends a lot on wha
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 11:36:14PM -0500 or thereabouts, Jim Levie wrote:
> cracker simply runs a tool kit that attempts to exploit all known
> vulnerabilities for that OS. If one works, they are in, and if not they
> move on to another system. The tools themselves seldom check version
> informatio
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 14:21, Mike Nuss wrote:
> Ken Murchison wrote:
>
> > Sascha Wuestemann wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> when sending email over cyrus imap, it gives full information about
> >> version. So, an attacker has just to telnet at port 25 to see if his
> >> bunch of exploits fits to it
Ken Murchison wrote:
Sascha Wuestemann wrote:
Hi,
when sending email over cyrus imap, it gives full information about
version. So, an attacker has just to telnet at port 25 to see if his
bunch of exploits fits to it.
That is a dangerous and I would like to suppress all version
information, even tha
Sascha Wuestemann wrote:
Hi,
when sending email over cyrus imap, it gives full information about
version. So, an attacker has just to telnet at port 25 to see if his
bunch of exploits fits to it.
That is a dangerous and I would like to suppress all version
information, even that it is cyrus answeri
Hi,
when sending email over cyrus imap, it gives full information about
version. So, an attacker has just to telnet at port 25 to see if his
bunch of exploits fits to it.
That is a dangerous and I would like to suppress all version
information, even that it is cyrus answering, if possible.
Can y
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, AJ wrote:
I am trying to decide what version of cyrus-imapd to go with in our
rollout. I have seen some issues in releases after 2.2.3.
I am thinking of sticking with 2.2.3 for now, but read that the mailboxes.db
file should not be in Berkeley db format, which i think is tr
Hey guys,
I am trying to decide what version of cyrus-imapd to go with in our
rollout. I have seen some issues in releases after 2.2.3.
I am thinking of sticking with 2.2.3 for now, but read that the
mailboxes.db file should not be in Berkeley db format, which i think is
true for 2.2.3. Any
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 10:49:18AM +0200, Pascal Gienger wrote:
> 1. Dump your mailboxes-Database on the old system:
> ctl_mboxlist -d > mailboxes.dump
> Copy the resulting "mailboxes.dump" to the new server.
...
Does one have to do any of that when upgrading say 2.2-beta to 2.4, or can
one r
"Hans M. Schleidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
I hat to rebuild a new server with fully new cyrus. Now i must bring the
old messages to the new cyrus. Only copy get wrong.
What are the goals to do that? Wich files (mailboxes.db, cyrus.cache,
cyrus.header, and so on) shout i bring it to the ne
Hi.
I hat to rebuild a new server with fully new cyrus. Now i must bring the old
messages to the new cyrus. Only copy get wrong.
What are the goals to do that? Wich files (mailboxes.db, cyrus.cache,
cyrus.header, and so on) shout i bring it to the new system?
I couldt not find any howto in the
Dumb question, but what is the different between cyrus IMAP v1.6.24 and
v2.0.7? Will Cyrus-SASL v1.5 work on both of them, or do each version
have its own unique SASL bianry?
dwc
19 matches
Mail list logo
