John Alton Tamplin said:
> He is referring to HP certifying the software, which I am sure has more
> to do with demand than anything devious. HP isn't going to go to the
> trouble to support some version that not many of their customers are
> using. I am not sure why you would fault RedHat for
Craig Ringer wrote:
[OT: Yes, I'm aware that there other other Linuces beyond RH, but we're
committed to HP hardware which is only certified for RH and SuSE (one of
my colleagues has been told by an HP engineer that they support
Debian but
I've yet to see anything official). We have zero SuSE exp
[OT: Yes, I'm aware that there other other Linuces beyond RH, but we're
committed to HP hardware which is only certified for RH and SuSE (one of
my colleagues has been told by an HP engineer that they support Debian but
I've yet to see anything official). We have zero SuSE experience in-house,
so R
Simon Brady schrieb:
>
> Hello world,
>
> We're planning to retire our Solaris mail server at the end of the year
> and move Cyrus to Linux. I'd intended to move to RH7.3, which we use
> widely and understand quite well, but Red Hat's support policies have
> killed that idea.
>
> Is anyone curre
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 20:35, Simon Brady wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> We're planning to retire our Solaris mail server at the end of the year
> and move Cyrus to Linux. I'd intended to move to RH7.3, which we use
> widely and understand quite well, but Red Hat's support policies have
> killed that id
Hello world,
We're planning to retire our Solaris mail server at the end of the year
and move Cyrus to Linux. I'd intended to move to RH7.3, which we use
widely and understand quite well, but Red Hat's support policies have
killed that idea.
Is anyone currently running Cyrus on Red Hat Enterprise
