On Sat, Oct 22, 2016, at 10:25 AM, Rob N ★ via Info-cyrus wrote:
> The docs suggest this feature is in the currently-unreleased Cyrus 3.0
> series. That's probably true, but I can't be sure (FastMail runs the
> current dev/master branch, so we're ahead of 3.0). It'll be well worth
> the upgrade whe
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, at 10:25, Rob N ★ via Info-cyrus wrote:
> Its worth noting that tiered search indexes are possible, but are
> managed through a different set of config options. I'm not going
> to write about that right now because there's no docs for me to
> point back to and search setup is a
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, at 08:46 PM, Vladislav Kurz via Info-cyrus wrote:
> would you be so kind and point to some info (docs, howtos) about cyrus
> tiered storage? All I found is
> http://www.cyrusimap.org/~vanmeeuwen/imap/features/mail-spool-partitions.html
> but that seem to be quite tedious to set
On 10/21/16 10:47, Rob N ★ via Info-cyrus wrote:
> At FastMail we have our mail spools on SSDs, in RAID10. We use Intel DC
> S3700 which, while on the expensive side, have been incredibly reliable
> and fast. They're all still 6G SATA; we're still looking at NVMe (with
> some enthusiasm).
>
> We a
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, at 05:28 AM, Michael Ulitskiy via Info-cyrus wrote:
> My question is: assuming cost is not an issue, would it be advisable
> to put an entire cyrus mail spool on SSD?
> I'm thinking about combinining multiple SSDs into RAID10 to further
> increase performance.
At FastMail we h
I actually just migrated our Cyrus (IMAP) server and was looking into this same
questions.
I think SSD's are great! Especially in laptops where the drive is susceptible
to sudden changes in inertia (in spinners this can lead to physical mechanical
damage, but SSD's are immune), not to mention t
> "MU" == Michael Ulitskiy via Info-cyrus
> writes:
MU> My question is: assuming cost is not an issue, would it be advisable
MU> to put an entire cyrus mail spool on SSD? I'm thinking about
MU> combinining multiple SSDs into RAID10 to further increase
MU> performance.
I don't see why n
Hello,
I have a task to build a mail server with the following requirements:
1. ~ hundred mailboxes with up to 10G of data each
2. several mailboxes that may grow up to 100G each
3. client insists that splitting data into folders is inconvenient to them and
so
all/most of that data will likely li
