On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Scott Russell wrote:
Ken Murchison wrote:
Changes to the Cyrus IMAP Server since 2.2.x
I'm more curious about what led sites to deploy 2.3.x over 2.2.x and how the
stability has been along with maintenance issues, if any, of staying up to
date on the development bran
Ken Murchison wrote:
Changes to the Cyrus IMAP Server since 2.2.x
I'm more curious about what led sites to deploy 2.3.x over 2.2.x and how
the stability has been along with maintenance issues, if any, of staying
up to date on the development branch.
I'm excited about the feature list too
Etienne Goyer wrote:
Ken Murchison wrote:
* Added support for "unified" and "replicated" Murders. A Murder
no longer has to have discrete frontend and backend servers; any one
"unified" server can both proxy and serve local mailboxes (proxy
functionality in proxyd and lmtpproxyd has been
Ken Murchison wrote:
* Added support for "unified" and "replicated" Murders. A Murder no
longer has to have discrete frontend and backend servers; any one
"unified" server can both proxy and serve local mailboxes (proxy
functionality in proxyd and lmtpproxyd has been merged with imapd and
Scott Russell wrote:
Greets -
I'm going to be rebuilding our cyrus imap 2.1.x server in the next month
and trying to figure out which version of cyrus I should use next. I
understand that 2.2.x is stable and that 2.3.x in CVS is the development
however it appears that some sites have jumped
Greets -
I'm going to be rebuilding our cyrus imap 2.1.x server in the next month
and trying to figure out which version of cyrus I should use next. I
understand that 2.2.x is stable and that 2.3.x in CVS is the development
however it appears that some sites have jumped to 2.3 anyway. (What
r
