Re: Cyrus+SASL+kerberos V

2003-10-16 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Stephan Buys wrote: > I dont know what exactly you mean with virtual domains. In our case, as there > is a direct mapping from the mailbox name: > ie. user/[EMAIL PROTECTED], using SASL and LDAP with the logon > credentials [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > lmtp delivers the mail directly

Re: Cyrus+SASL+kerberos V

2003-10-16 Thread Stephan Buys
Hi, Thanks for the answer. On Thursday 16 October 2003 17:38, you wrote: > > As I understand it SASL only support the default realm as well? > > No, this isn't the case. The default/local realm is stripped from the > user identifiers, but you can use the loginrealms option to allow logins > from

Re: Cyrus+SASL+kerberos V

2003-10-16 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Stephan Buys wrote: > Hi all, > > We are using unixhierarchysep and lmtp on our server, with usernames in the > form of [EMAIL PROTECTED], user information and passwords resides in LDAP and > is accessed through SASL. > > The fact that we use unixhierarchysep allows us to easi

Cyrus+SASL+kerberos V

2003-10-16 Thread Stephan Buys
Hi all, We are using unixhierarchysep and lmtp on our server, with usernames in the form of [EMAIL PROTECTED], user information and passwords resides in LDAP and is accessed through SASL. The fact that we use unixhierarchysep allows us to easily support multiple domains, ie. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [E