Re: Converting deliver.db from berkely-nosync to skiplist

2005-09-26 Thread Michael Loftis
--On September 26, 2005 2:15:01 PM -0400 Brenden Conte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Skiplist doesn't have fast lookups? I admit to not knowing the intricacies of the various formats, but i thought skiplist and Berkeley were at least comparable, as the opinion i've seen has been that skiplist

Re: Converting deliver.db from berkely-nosync to skiplist

2005-09-26 Thread Ken Murchison
Brenden Conte wrote: Skiplist doesn't have fast lookups? I admit to not knowing the intricacies of the various formats, but i thought skiplist and Berkeley were at least comparable, as the opinion i've seen has been that skiplist is better, especially when encountering corruption with berkele

Re: Converting deliver.db from berkely-nosync to skiplist

2005-09-26 Thread Brenden Conte
Skiplist doesn't have fast lookups? I admit to not knowing the intricacies of the various formats, but i thought skiplist and Berkeley were at least comparable, as the opinion i've seen has been that skiplist is better, especially when encountering corruption with berkeley. Also, that is not

Re: Converting deliver.db from berkely-nosync to skiplist

2005-09-25 Thread Henk . Roose
Brenden Conte wrote: > Using RPM version of 2.2.10 and Berkeley DB 4.1.25... > > We've run into problems the last few nights with corruption of the > duplicate delivery database (delivery.db). I tried disabling it, however > that caused processes to fail to communicate to the local lmtp socke

Converting deliver.db from berkely-nosync to skiplist

2005-09-23 Thread Brenden Conte
Using RPM version of 2.2.10 and Berkeley DB 4.1.25... We've run into problems the last few nights with corruption of the duplicate delivery database (delivery.db). I tried disabling it, however that caused processes to fail to communicate to the local lmtp sockets for some reason. We do enj