On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Paul Vallee wrote:
> No, unless that's the default...
No, it's not the default.
> # mount
> /dev/hda1 on / type ext2 (rw)
> none on /proc type proc (rw)
> /dev/hdb1 on /u01 type ext2 (rw)
> /dev/hda5 on /u03 type ext2 (rw)
> /dev/hdd1 on /u04 type ext2 (rw)
> none on /dev/p
if that's what it would mean.
Thanks for the suggestion,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Marco Colombo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Vallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: Cha
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Paul Vallee wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are having performance problems with our mailserver, especially when we
> try to back it up. I am attempting to set up an incremental backup of the
> imap spool, and preferably to include only files since the last incremental
> backup. I am
"Darin Perusich " wrote:
> with the sgi XFS port which works good. i'm leery of putting it onto
> production systems, i'd rather not use a 1.0 filesytem.
It may be a 1.0 filesystem under Linux, but XFS itself has been well proven.
We are using the XFS 1.0.1 patches to the redhat 7.1 kernel on a nu
Joe Ellis wrote:
>
> Paul Vallee wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are having performance problems with our mailserver, especially when we
> > try to back it up. I am attempting to set up an incremental backup of the
> > imap spool, and preferably to include only files since the last incremental
i've been using reiserfs on my linux servers for quote some time now and
i've never had a problem. i have my mailstore on the filesystem running
on 2 18gb SCA drives running software raid-1 through the kernel, i
pulled one of the drives and it kept on kickin. i've been playing around
with the sgi
Paul Vallee wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are having performance problems with our mailserver, especially when we
> try to back it up. I am attempting to set up an incremental backup of the
> imap spool, and preferably to include only files since the last incremental
> backup. I am a reasonably advan
Thus spake Kevin M. Myer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Along those lines, I'd like to hear any success stories that folks have
> had with Reiserfs. My one experience with it on my workstation so far has
> been bad but that was over half a year ago and I'm happily running ext3 on
> my workstation now so
> If so, which filesystem is most appropriate? ext3 is very easy to implement,
> but I can't imagine that it could make that big of a difference in
> performance. Reiserfs, jfs, etc. I understand may also be options. I would
> like to hear the consensus best fs for cyrus from the list, please.
Al
Hello,
We are having performance problems with our mailserver, especially when we
try to back it up. I am attempting to set up an incremental backup of the
imap spool, and preferably to include only files since the last incremental
backup. I am a reasonably advanced shell scripter, and I don't ne
10 matches
Mail list logo
