Re: Changing databases at runtime

2002-11-26 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > On 25 Nov 2002, Rob Siemborski writes: > > On 25 Nov 2002, Erik Enge wrote: > This is in part a packaging and upgrading issue, though. Especially Detecting the backends and running a script or program when the backends changed is simple enough for my

Re: Changing databases at runtime

2002-11-26 Thread Simon Matter
Tarjei Huse schrieb: > > <(snip)> > > > 'worse' as new backends are implemented, the ability to build a > > > compiled version of Cyrus that could find and use whatever database > > > format it can see (or failing that, whatever database some separate > > > utility can see and then edit into the c

Re: Changing databases at runtime

2002-11-26 Thread Tarjei Huse
<(snip)> > > 'worse' as new backends are implemented, the ability to build a > > compiled version of Cyrus that could find and use whatever database > > format it can see (or failing that, whatever database some separate > > utility can see and then edit into the config files), would probably > > h

Re: Changing databases at runtime

2002-11-26 Thread Simon Matter
Jonathan Marsden schrieb: > > On 25 Nov 2002, Rob Siemborski writes: > > > On 25 Nov 2002, Erik Enge wrote: > > >> I wouldn't rate it as easy unless it was a config option at > >> run-time, not an option to configure at compile-time. > > > This wouldn't be tremendously hard to do (probably just

Re: Changing databases at runtime

2002-11-25 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > This probably isn't something of great utility to CMU, but for the I think you hit the nail on the head here. > average Linux sysadmin who just wants to grab an RPM or a .deb and > install it and have Cyrus "just work", upgrading as new RPMs/.debs a

Changing databases at runtime

2002-11-25 Thread Jonathan Marsden
On 25 Nov 2002, Rob Siemborski writes: > On 25 Nov 2002, Erik Enge wrote: >> I wouldn't rate it as easy unless it was a config option at >> run-time, not an option to configure at compile-time. > This wouldn't be tremendously hard to do (probably just a matter of > replacing some macros with som