G'day,
I have a NetBSD (pkgsrc) box that I'm moving email from an old sendmail
setup over to, using cyrus imapd and the new box is using postfix (from
pkgsrc, v2.11.3).
A weird problem, it's bouncing emails if the domain name is uppercase.
I have set
lmtp_downcase_rcpt: 1
but it doesn't seem t
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:11:47 +0200
> Subject: case sensitivity
>
> I discovered by accident that lmtpd (or possibly deliver, or b
Zitat von Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I discovered by accident that lmtpd (or possibly deliver, or both) is
case-sensitive; mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will bounce with
550-Mailbox unknown. Either there is no mailbox associated with this
550-name or you do not have authorization to see
>From imapd.conf:
# Forcing recipient user to lowercase
# Cyrus 2.1 is case-sensitive. If all your mail users are in lowercase, it is
# probably a very good idea to set lmtp_downcase_rcpt to true. The default is
# to assume the user knows what he is doing, and not downcase anything.
lmtp_downcas
Am Freitag 29 April 2005 11:11 schrieb Dag-Erling Smørgrav:
> I discovered by accident that lmtpd (or possibly deliver, or both) is
> case-sensitive; mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will bounce with
>
> 550-Mailbox unknown. Either there is no mailbox associated with this
> 550-name or you do not have au
I discovered by accident that lmtpd (or possibly deliver, or both) is
case-sensitive; mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will bounce with
550-Mailbox unknown. Either there is no mailbox associated with this
550-name or you do not have authorization to see it.
Is this intentional? It doesn't seem right;
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
> --On Tuesday, December 24, 2002 11:57 PM -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
> >>--On Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:01 AM -0200 Henrique de Moraes
> >>Holschuh <[EMAIL P
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
> --On Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:01 AM -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Here's the cleaned up patch, against 2.1 CVS. It could be enhanced not to
> >touch the +fooobar part of the recipient, I suppose.
>
> I
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Scott Smith wrote:
> OK. I finally found the note in the Postfix changelog, but that doesn't
> explain why he claims that the behavior changed without changing Postfix
> versions?
Beats me, I have no idea whatsoever...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them.
OK. I finally found the note in the Postfix changelog, but that doesn't
explain why he claims that the behavior changed without changing Postfix
versions?
Scott
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ``Chews? I'll take charleston
http://storm.lackluster.net/~scott/ chews for SIXTEEN MILLIO
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Scott Smith wrote:
> I am using a UNIX socket for Cyrus LMTPregardless, at some point,
> someone stated that this behavior has changed with Postfix. I am using
> 1.1.12, which up until, like, Sunday was the latest release.
Latest *stable* release. And yes, the snapshot re
I am using a UNIX socket for Cyrus LMTPregardless, at some point,
someone stated that this behavior has changed with Postfix. I am using
1.1.12, which up until, like, Sunday was the latest release.
Discussion on this list has implied that this behavior (Postfix NOT
lowercasing the username, s
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Scott Smith wrote:
> So like, what's the problem? Works fine for me:
Your postfix is still downcasing the lmtp recipient. Try with lmtptest.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of R
So like, what's the problem? Works fine for me:
Dec 24 02:00:15 storm postfix/qmgr[88272]: F0DACCEE0B:
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=644, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Dec 24 02:00:15 storm postfix/smtpd[88677]: disconnect from
gecko.roadtoad.net[209.209.8.2]
Dec 24 02:00:15 storm postfix/lmtp[88678]: F
Here's the cleaned up patch, against 2.1 CVS. It could be enhanced not to
touch the +fooobar part of the recipient, I suppose.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." --
t release of cyrus-imapd-2.1.11, is there now case
> sensitivity on the lmtp delivery. With 2.1.10 and previous version, I could
> email VFORT and well as vfort and it would be delivered. I just (today)
> reinstall our mail server from:
>
> Cyrus-2.0.16 to cyrus-2.1.11 using t
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Amos Gouaux wrote:
> When the discussion came up on postfix-users after some folks found
> this problematic, it was decided that it was wrong of the lmtp
> client to forcibly downcase everything. Now we run into this fun.
Bleh. They should have added an option so that we ca
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:12:42 -0200,
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (hdmh) writes:
hdmh> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
>>
>> Cyrus-2.0.16 to cyrus-2.1.11 using the same version of postfix.
>>
hdmh> Well, as a workaround, use pipe delivery on postfix (and
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
>
> Cyrus-2.0.16 to cyrus-2.1.11 using the same version of postfix.
>
Well, as a workaround, use pipe delivery on postfix (and thus, use the
deliver Cyrus program, which is much slower than LMTP), and tell postfix to
lowercase the recipient.
With the current release of cyrus-imapd-2.1.11, is there now case
sensitivity on the lmtp delivery. With 2.1.10 and previous version, I could
email VFORT and well as vfort and it would be delivered. I just (today)
reinstall our mail server from:
Cyrus-2.0.16 to cyrus-2.1.11
20 matches
Mail list logo
