Quoting Christian Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ken Murchison wrote:
>
> >Quoting Christian Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> >
> Your other choice is to skip 2.1 and jump into 2.2
> available from CVS. Since you're already compiling
> your cyrus (as opposed to prepackaged b
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 04:23:59AM +0200, Christian Schulte wrote:
> >
> Thanks! But I still cannot get the inter-domain admins to work.
>
> Thats my new imapd.conf file:
>
> configdirectory: /var/imap
> partition-default: /var/spool/imap
> defaultdomain: somedomain.com
> servername: imap.somedo
Quoting Christian Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Your other choice is to skip 2.1 and jump into 2.2
> >> available from CVS. Since you're already compiling
> >> your cyrus (as opposed to prepackaged binary) and
> >> you want virtual domains support (and willing to go
> >> to great lengths
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Michael Fair wrote:
> > First I did:
> >
> > cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co -d cyrus-imapd cyrus
> >
> > and then I did like this:
> >
> > cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co -d cyrus-imapd-2_2 -r
> > cyrus-imapd-2_2 cyrus
> >
> > What is correct ? Which one
> First I did:
>
> cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co -d cyrus-imapd cyrus
>
> and then I did like this:
>
> cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co -d cyrus-imapd-2_2 -r
> cyrus-imapd-2_2 cyrus
>
> What is correct ? Which one should I use ? I think without specifiying
> any tag or
Michael Fair wrote:
>Your other choice is to skip 2.1 and jump into 2.2
>available from CVS. Since you're already compiling
>your cyrus (as opposed to prepackaged binary) and
>you want virtual domains support (and willing to go
>to great lengths to get it), I'd suggest getting the
>2.2 branch w
>
>
>You _should_ not have to reconstruct any mailboxes, since the mailbox format
>hasn't changed (well, a small one was made for POP UIDL, but it'll be upgraded
>on the fly). You'll want to read doc/install-upgrade.html and do everything
>that applies from 2.0.16 forward.
>
>You'll also want
PS This might be a dumb question but you do have
your "sasl_pwcheck_method" set to "auxprop"
in imapd.conf right?
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Schulte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Fair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <
Quoting Christian Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> >>>The unix hierarchy separator is key here because you
> >>>want to have a "." in the username.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>I think this would do it. But how to enable that in 2.0.16 ?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >It's probably only available as a
>
>
>>>The unix hierarchy separator is key here because you
>>>want to have a "." in the username.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I think this would do it. But how to enable that in 2.0.16 ?
>>
>>
>
>It's probably only available as a patch in the 2.0.x
>series (I'm not to keen on exactly which versions h
> I have testtesttest in the loginrealms and it does not work ! Even
> without unixhierarchysep. I cannot login to
> user.testtesttest@testtesttest with login testtesttest@testtesttest !
How are you testing authentication?
This is where I start questioning the fact that no messages
(from your
> Three things:
> 1) I mispelled the option :}
> 2) In my imapd.conf (Cyrus 2.1.9) it is "unixhierarchysep"
> 3) The option may only be available as a patch to the 2.0 series
>
> This feature converts the normal separator character "."
> to "/". By making the separator "/" you can then put "."
12 matches
Mail list logo