Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:42:52 -0500, "Ken Murchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hi Rob,
This is already a known problem (bug #2727?). I haven't come up with a
"clean" fix yet, although I haven't thought about it much.
My reading of this is that it affects SEEN state gener
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:42:52 -0500, "Ken Murchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi Rob,
>
> This is already a known problem (bug #2727?). I haven't come up with a
> "clean" fix yet, although I haven't thought about it much.
My reading of this is that it affects SEEN state generally, not just
Robert Mueller wrote:
Hi Ken
There's a bug with replication and renaming INBOX -> INBOX.blah.
From http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3501.txt:
Renaming INBOX is permitted, and has special behavior. It moves
all messages in INBOX to a new mailbox with the given name,
leaving INBOX emp
Hi Ken
There's a bug with replication and renaming INBOX -> INBOX.blah.
From http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3501.txt:
Renaming INBOX is permitted, and has special behavior. It moves
all messages in INBOX to a new mailbox with the given name,
leaving INBOX empty. If the server imp
