Re: ACAP Status, again

2004-12-28 Thread OpenMacNews
hi, just fyi, Stalker's CommuniGatePro mail server has a relatively robust (well, ok, that's subjective. at least it never caused any problems ...) ACAP server. It's worked very nicely with Mulberry as an ACAP client for remote prefs to date. having 'moved on' from the CGP 'realm', and explori

Re: ACAP Status, again

2004-12-28 Thread Gerhard Gonter
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 11:48:02 -0500 (EST), Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, Rob Siemborski wrote: > > > Most of the problem is that there aren't really a wealth of clients that > > support it (as it is, finding IMSP clients is hard :). > > And supporting them co

Re: ACAP Status, again

2004-12-28 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, Rob Siemborski wrote: Most of the problem is that there aren't really a wealth of clients that support it (as it is, finding IMSP clients is hard :). And supporting them correctly is harder. --- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.and

Re: ACAP Status, again

2004-12-26 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, Gerhard Gonter wrote: On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 11:39:45 -0500 (EST), Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] ACAP was mostly replaced in the role that CMU/Cyrus was planning to use it for by the MUPDATE server, which has very limited functionality next to ACAP, but does exac

Re: ACAP Status, again

2004-12-26 Thread Gerhard Gonter
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 11:39:45 -0500 (EST), Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > ACAP was mostly replaced in the role that CMU/Cyrus was planning to use it > for by the MUPDATE server, which has very limited functionality next to > ACAP, but does exactly what the Murder architechure ne

Re: ACAP Status, again

2004-12-26 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004, Gerhard Gonter wrote: After scanning quickly through the mail archives, I got the impression that ACAP is pretty much ... uh... in a coma. The last mail about the status was from Sep. 2002. Has anything changed since then? Is it worth to play around with it at all? ACAP was

ACAP Status, again

2004-12-25 Thread Gerhard Gonter
After scanning quickly through the mail archives, I got the impression that ACAP is pretty much ... uh... in a coma. The last mail about the status was from Sep. 2002. Has anything changed since then? Is it worth to play around with it at all? Enough questions for today. Cheers! GG --- Cyrus

Re: ACAP Status

2002-09-27 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Benjamin Zeiss wrote: > i'm wondering about the current status of ACAP. It seems that 2 years or so > ago the development > of the cyrus sml daemon has stopped and it was left in a quite unfinished > state > (i.e. missing /et directory). i'm wondering: > > - is there currentl

ACAP Status

2002-09-27 Thread Benjamin Zeiss
Hello guys, i'm wondering about the current status of ACAP. It seems that 2 years or so ago the development of the cyrus sml daemon has stopped and it was left in a quite unfinished state (i.e. missing /et directory). i'm wondering: - is there currently any development (protocol/daemon/client-