On 4/29/05, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Adrian Buciuman wrote:
> > 4. Care should be taken not to rfc2047-encode text which must be
> > ASCII. Even when properly encoded, non-ASCII is not valid anywhere in
> > headers.
>
> Huh? I don't understand
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Adrian Buciuman wrote:
> Why not encode the header using unknown-8bit as the charset?? This is
> simpler, and has many advantages:
It still would cause problems for IMAP search. Well, mostly, as one could
just not index (and thus not search) any unknown-8bit headers at all...
On 4/28/05, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What you *have* to do to get such a thing accepted is to, instead, write
> something that *fixes* the headers with the following capabilities:
>
> 1. Notion of a default source charset, which is a hint of the charset to
> e
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Igor Belikov wrote:
> I don't complain about "X", but I also have no time to do more
> "correct" modifications.
>
> Sorry.
Same here. So far, nobody stepped up to fix the issue properly, or offered
to pay, e.g. Ken to do it. So, "X" it is :-)
--
"One disk to rule them a
Hello Henrique,
Thursday, April 28, 2005, 6:33:18 PM, you wrote:
HdMH> To the bitbucket, it will not be accepted.
[]
HdMH> So far, nobody that keeps complaining about the "X" things has taken the
HdMH> time to do the above.
I don't complain about "X", but I also have no time to do more
"correc
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Igor Belikov wrote:
> After all I make patch, that adds option "ignore8bit" into
> imapd.conf. If this option set to "true" - Cyrus don't pay attention
> to 8-bit characters in headers at all, and our customers receive
> readable
Hello info-cyrus,
I'm completely tired by stupid users that violate RFC and send
e-mails with 8-bit characters in headers. I can do nothing with
those users, so our customers permanently receive some amount of
mail from "X" to "X" with subject "XXX
