> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:00:00AM +0100, Simon Matter wrote:
>> Found it, sort of. The messages in question don't have any Received:
>> headers. They are in the Sent folder and old clients/servers didn't seem
>> to send Received: headers in that case.
>> Now, does it make sense to fall back to D
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:00:00AM +0100, Simon Matter wrote:
> Found it, sort of. The messages in question don't have any Received:
> headers. They are in the Sent folder and old clients/servers didn't seem
> to send Received: headers in that case.
> Now, does it make sense to fall back to Date: h
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:36:17AM +0100, Simon Matter wrote:
> I've done some upgrades from 2.3.16 to 2.4.6 and it seems sometimes a
> reconstruct is the only way to get a mailbox work after upgrade. While
> running reconstruct two things have shown up which I have not seen wirh
> older releases:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've done some upgrades from 2.3.16 to 2.4.6 and it seems sometimes a
>> reconstruct is the only way to get a mailbox work after upgrade. While
>> running reconstruct two things have shown up which I have not seen wirh
>> older releases:
>>
>> 1) on a mailbox which was used by a client
> Hi,
>
> I've done some upgrades from 2.3.16 to 2.4.6 and it seems sometimes a
> reconstruct is the only way to get a mailbox work after upgrade. While
> running reconstruct two things have shown up which I have not seen wirh
> older releases:
>
> 1) on a mailbox which was used by a client reconst
Hi,
I've done some upgrades from 2.3.16 to 2.4.6 and it seems sometimes a
reconstruct is the only way to get a mailbox work after upgrade. While
running reconstruct two things have shown up which I have not seen wirh
older releases:
1) on a mailbox which was used by a client reconstruct was just
