Rob Mueller wrote:
Actually, my intent wasn't to _store_ a script via IMAP ANNOTATEMORE. I
was only intending to _select_ (activate) a script via the annotation.
I still anticipate using MANAGESIEVE to do the upload/download.
Would it be hard to add the ability to store scripts as well? It wou
On 8 Jul 2003, Ken Murchison writes:
> Just out of curiousity, are there any non-eLISP IMAP clients?
Sure, all the ones written in other languages... oh, that's not what
you meant?Parsing that as "(non-e)LISP IMAP clients":
One called PostOffice is at http://opensource.franz.com/postoffice/
> Actually, my intent wasn't to _store_ a script via IMAP ANNOTATEMORE. I
> was only intending to _select_ (activate) a script via the annotation.
> I still anticipate using MANAGESIEVE to do the upload/download.
Would it be hard to add the ability to store scripts as well? It would be
nice to be
Amos Gouaux wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 14:33:53 -0400,
Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (km) writes:
km> IIRC, the original IMAP client written by Mark Crispin was written in LISP.
Hey, some of us still use (e)LISP mail clients, not that I'm
Right. I've been known to use Emacs to read email
> On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 14:33:53 -0400,
> Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (km) writes:
km> IIRC, the original IMAP client written by Mark Crispin was written in LISP.
Hey, some of us still use (e)LISP mail clients, not that I'm
encouraging a client/language debate. Really. ;-)
--
Amos
Stephen L. Ulmer wrote:
Of course if Cyrus IMAPd were implemented in LISP
Now that's old school. ;) I'm sure I've forgotten more about LISP, and
functional languages in general, than I remember.
IIRC, the original IMAP client written by Mark Crispin was written in LISP.
--
Kenneth Murch
Hi Ken,
--On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 11:34 AM -0400 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
|> What about IMAP APPEND? Does that trigger the script? It really ought to
|> as well.
|
| I hadn't anticipated this. What would be the need/advantage of this?
|
There is a huge potential for using sieve
Cyrus Daboo wrote:
Hi Rob,
--On Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:08 AM +1000 Rob Mueller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> True. I hadn't thought about that. This might be worth exploring.
|
| I think this would be great. Personally I found the whole concept of
| having an entirely different protocol
Hi Rob,
--On Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:08 AM +1000 Rob Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
|> True. I hadn't thought about that. This might be worth exploring.
|
| I think this would be great. Personally I found the whole concept of
| having an entirely different protocol to manage sieve scrip
> > Should a script attached to INBOX actually be the users primary
> > (delivery) SIEVE script? If so setting that script via IMAP ANNTATEMORE
> > should have the same effect as doing so via ManageSIEVE.
> >
>
> True. I hadn't thought about that. This might be worth exploring.
I think this woul
> On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 09:59:20 -0400,
> Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (km) writes:
km> Now that Cyrus 2.2 has support for mailbox annotations, I believe
km> that we can provide the functionality that people desire.
I just have to say: WOOHOO!!! :-)
OK, perhaps a little premature, bu
Cyrus Daboo wrote:
Hi Ken,
--On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 9:59 AM -0400 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| In the past, people have requested the ability to run sieve scripts when
| messages are posted directly to shared mailboxes (via +detail
| addressing). I have suggested that this wo
Stephen L. Ulmer wrote:
On 8 Jul 2003, Ken Murchison stated:
In the past, people have requested the ability to run sieve scripts
when messages are posted directly to shared mailboxes (via +detail
addressing). I have suggested that this would be possible by
associating a script with the 'postu
Hi Ken,
--On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 9:59 AM -0400 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| In the past, people have requested the ability to run sieve scripts when
| messages are posted directly to shared mailboxes (via +detail
| addressing). I have suggested that this would be possible by ass
In the past, people have requested the ability to run sieve scripts when
messages are posted directly to shared mailboxes (via +detail
addressing). I have suggested that this would be possible by
associating a script with the 'postuser' (typically "bb" or ""), but
this was deemed unacceptable
15 matches
Mail list logo
