--On Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:01 AM -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's the cleaned up patch, against 2.1 CVS. It could be enhanced not to
touch the +fooobar part of the recipient, I suppose.
Yes, and I wanted to add a comment on this... Put the work in now
> On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 00:37:19 -0600 (CST),
> Scott Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ss) writes:
ss> Damn, I fouind it earlier. Do a search for canonical, and/or lowercase
ss> and/or regex.
Really, it applies to any map lookup, which is why we haven't run
into any problems...
ss> It's actually
Damn, I fouind it earlier. Do a search for canonical, and/or lowercase
and/or regex.
It's actually funny: Back in ~2000 Weitse sent several E-mails stating
that Postfix lowercased everything because he felt it was simply
unacceptable to require end users to know what CaPiTaLiZaTiOn (he even
typed
--On Tuesday, December 24, 2002 11:57 PM -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
--On Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:01 AM -0200 Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the cleaned up patch, against 2.1
--On Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:01 AM -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's the cleaned up patch, against 2.1 CVS. It could be enhanced not to
touch the +fooobar part of the recipient, I suppose.
I guess I'm mostly of the opinion that this is an MTA job, as mos
