Morgan Sackett wrote:
>
> Morgan Sackett wrote:
>
> > John A. Tamplin wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> 1.5 did not have altnamespace, it was always INBOX.Trash etc.
> >>
> >> What exactly is the problem with having \Noinferiors set on INBOX?
> >> In altnamespace, it does not have any subfolders. Ie, if I h
Morgan Sackett wrote:
John A. Tamplin wrote:
1.5 did not have altnamespace, it was always INBOX.Trash etc.
What exactly is the problem with having \Noinferiors set on INBOX?
In altnamespace, it does not have any subfolders. Ie, if I have
user/jtampli and user/jtampli/test, that will show up a
Rob Siemborski wrote:
altnamespace=yes should give you same level folders, altnamespace=no
should give you nexting.
-Rob
Unfortunately, I'm seeing the opposite results. If I have
altnamespace=no, then I can see and sub to all of the folders and they
are at the same level as INBOX. Inbox ha
John A. Tamplin wrote:
1.5 did not have altnamespace, it was always INBOX.Trash etc.
What exactly is the problem with having \Noinferiors set on INBOX? In
altnamespace, it does not have any subfolders. Ie, if I have
user/jtampli and user/jtampli/test, that will show up as INBOX and
test, and
Morgan Sackett wrote:
Changing altnamespace to "no" results in seeing the folders, but they
appear at the same level as INBOX. That means that I cannot select a
subfolder called INBOX.Trash, for example. This will break all of my
users.
It seems as though this behaviour changes from version
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Morgan Sackett wrote:
> Changing altnamespace to "no" results in seeing the folders, but they
> appear at the same level as INBOX. That means that I cannot select a
> subfolder called INBOX.Trash, for example. This will break all of my users.
>
> It seems as though this beha
Changing altnamespace to "no" results in seeing the folders, but they
appear at the same level as INBOX. That means that I cannot select a
subfolder called INBOX.Trash, for example. This will break all of my users.
It seems as though this behaviour changes from version to version.
1.5.x gave
Yes, altnamespace is enabled, and it always has been.
Ken Murchison wrote:
Morgan Sackett wrote:
Should this happen? I do have subfolders in the mailbox, but clients
won't look at them. Also, clients report errors in trying to create or
append messages into a subfolder. However, I can creat
Morgan Sackett wrote:
>
> Should this happen? I do have subfolders in the mailbox, but clients
> won't look at them. Also, clients report errors in trying to create or
> append messages into a subfolder. However, I can create a new folder
> both through cyradm, and directly logged in with a C
Should this happen? I do have subfolders in the mailbox, but clients
won't look at them. Also, clients report errors in trying to create or
append messages into a subfolder. However, I can create a new folder
both through cyradm, and directly logged in with a CREATE command.
Is there a way t
10 matches
Mail list logo
