Andreas Hasenack wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:16:48AM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
I remember seeing a similar problem someone had with an upgrade to
2.3.x in this list but I can't find it in the archives (or I'm
mistaken).
I had this problem.
I also had to reconstruct to make 2.3.x
Andreas Hasenack wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:16:48AM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
I remember seeing a similar problem someone had with an upgrade to
2.3.x in this list but I can't find it in the archives (or I'm
mistaken).
I had this problem.
I also had to reconstruct to make 2.3.x ha
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:16:48AM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> > I remember seeing a similar problem someone had with an upgrade to
> > 2.3.x in this list but I can't find it in the archives (or I'm
> > mistaken).
>
> I had this problem.
>
> I also had to reconstruct to make 2.3.x happy. It
Andreas Hasenack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just upgraded a home system from 2.2.12 to 2.3.3 and started
> getting the "invalid mailbox format" error. I then ran reconstruct
> and it worked after that.
Looks familiar to me...
> Before the reconstruct, if I downgraded back to 2.2.12, things
I just upgraded a home system from 2.2.12 to 2.3.3 and started getting the
"invalid mailbox format" error. I then ran reconstruct and it worked after
that.
Before the reconstruct, if I downgraded back to 2.2.12, things would get back
to normal.
I remember seeing a similar problem someone had
