Re: "Right Way" to track mailing-lists

2001-11-21 Thread Amos Gouaux
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 21:46:18 +0100, > Terje Elde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (te) writes: te> Only limitation is that without sieve filtering I'm left without the ability te> to properly filter mailing lists administered elsewhere which I subcribe to as te> a regular user to archive for public

Re: "Right Way" to track mailing-lists

2001-11-21 Thread Terje Elde
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 12:35:02AM -0600, Amos Gouaux wrote: > Before we switched to the altnamespace we had all our shared folders > under a "bb." prefix. Now we've moved all these folders up a > level. To send mail to such a folder, just put a "+" before the > address. If you don't like that,

Re: "Right Way" to track mailing-lists

2001-11-20 Thread Amos Gouaux
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 18:36:59 +0100, > Terje Elde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (te) writes: te> With the 1.6 series all I had to do was to call deliver such that it would te> deliver a message to the correct folder. With the 2.x series there are te> advantages to using lmtp for deliveries instea

Re: "Right Way" to track mailing-lists

2001-11-20 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 11/20/01 06:36 PM, Terje Elde sat at the `puter and typed: > Hi, > > I'm setting up a IMAP server, doing my installation of the 2.x series where > I'll be tracking mailing lists. > > With the 1.6 series all I had to do was to call deliver such that it would > deliver a message to the correct

"Right Way" to track mailing-lists

2001-11-20 Thread Terje Elde
Hi, I'm setting up a IMAP server, doing my installation of the 2.x series where I'll be tracking mailing lists. With the 1.6 series all I had to do was to call deliver such that it would deliver a message to the correct folder. With the 2.x series there are advantages to using lmtp for deliveri