Re: Re[2]: "+details" delivery

2003-09-26 Thread Pat Lashley
--On Friday, September 26, 2003 16:26:18 -0700 "Denis V. Suhanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: PL> There is one other thing that may or may not be an issue. Do you have a sieve script activated for your INBOX ? No, I do not have any sieve script activated. timsieved is running on the system though

Re[2]: "+details" delivery

2003-09-26 Thread Denis V. Suhanov
Hello Pat, Friday, September 26, 2003, 4:16:48 PM, you wrote: >> I tried that and added the "p" right (lam user.* anyone p) PL> Was that a typo? It should have been 'sam', not 'lam' to change Yes, that was a type. Sorry about that. I used (sam user.* anyone p) and I can see that the acls ar

Re: "+details" delivery

2003-09-26 Thread Pat Lashley
--On Friday, September 26, 2003 15:18:30 -0700 "Denis V. Suhanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Then rjs3+foo will file into user.rjs3.foo I tried that and added the "p" right (lam user.* anyone p) Was that a typo? It should have been 'sam', not 'lam' to change the acl. Once you've changed th

Re: "+details" delivery

2003-09-26 Thread Denis V. Suhanov
I've already asked for help with the "+detail" delivery and (thanks a lot, Rob) I got an answer on that: > As long as sendmail isn't stripping what is between the + and the @ > this should be easy, just give "anyone" the "p" right on the folders > in question. > > Then rjs3+foo will file i